Home Education in England: A Loose Thread in the Child Safeguarding Net?

Carl Purcell; Mary Baginsky; Jill Manthorpe; Jenny Driscoll

doi:10.1017/S1474746423000052

Home Education in England: A Loose Thread in the Child Safeguarding Net?

Carl Purcell, Mary Baginsky, Jill Manthorpe, Jenny Driscoll

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

For a small number of parents home education is a preferred alternative to school and in England more parents are taking up this option. This has refuelled a long-running debate about the adequacy of a regulatory framework under which parents are not required to register their children as home educated and provision is not routinely monitored. This article highlights concerns regarding the ability of local authorities to fulfil their duty to safeguard these children, drawing on interviews with sixty-eight officials working in twenty local authorities, national surveys of local education and safeguarding agencies and interviews with thirty-eight staff working in twenty-five schools. We argue that, although the Government’s Department of Education is committed to introducing compulsory registration of home-educated children, more is needed to strengthen local authority powers and to address the reasons why some parents choose, or feel pressured, to take their children out of school.

Original language	English
Journal	Social Policy and Society
Volume	42
Issue number	1
Early online date	16 Mar 2023
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1017/S1474746423000052
Publication status	Published - 16 Mar 2023

Access to Document

10.1017/S1474746423000052

Cite this

@article{54815437ff0743698653e3e33446ee03,

title = "Home Education in England: A Loose Thread in the Child Safeguarding Net?",

abstract = "For a small number of parents home education is a preferred alternative to school and in England more parents are taking up this option. This has refuelled a long-running debate about the adequacy of a regulatory framework under which parents are not required to register their children as home educated and provision is not routinely monitored. This article highlights concerns regarding the ability of local authorities to fulfil their duty to safeguard these children, drawing on interviews with sixty-eight officials working in twenty local authorities, national surveys of local education and safeguarding agencies and interviews with thirty-eight staff working in twenty-five schools. We argue that, although the Government{\textquoteright}s Department of Education is committed to introducing compulsory registration of home-educated children, more is needed to strengthen local authority powers and to address the reasons why some parents choose, or feel pressured, to take their children out of school. ",

author = "Carl Purcell and Mary Baginsky and Jill Manthorpe and Jenny Driscoll",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press.",

year = "2023",

month = mar,

day = "16",

doi = "10.1017/S1474746423000052",

language = "English",

volume = "42",

journal = "Social Policy and Society",

issn = "1474-7464",

publisher = "Cambridge University Press",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Home Education in England

T2 - A Loose Thread in the Child Safeguarding Net?

AU - Purcell, Carl

AU - Baginsky, Mary

AU - Manthorpe, Jill

AU - Driscoll, Jenny

PY - 2023/3/16

Y1 - 2023/3/16

N2 - For a small number of parents home education is a preferred alternative to school and in England more parents are taking up this option. This has refuelled a long-running debate about the adequacy of a regulatory framework under which parents are not required to register their children as home educated and provision is not routinely monitored. This article highlights concerns regarding the ability of local authorities to fulfil their duty to safeguard these children, drawing on interviews with sixty-eight officials working in twenty local authorities, national surveys of local education and safeguarding agencies and interviews with thirty-eight staff working in twenty-five schools. We argue that, although the Government’s Department of Education is committed to introducing compulsory registration of home-educated children, more is needed to strengthen local authority powers and to address the reasons why some parents choose, or feel pressured, to take their children out of school.

AB - For a small number of parents home education is a preferred alternative to school and in England more parents are taking up this option. This has refuelled a long-running debate about the adequacy of a regulatory framework under which parents are not required to register their children as home educated and provision is not routinely monitored. This article highlights concerns regarding the ability of local authorities to fulfil their duty to safeguard these children, drawing on interviews with sixty-eight officials working in twenty local authorities, national surveys of local education and safeguarding agencies and interviews with thirty-eight staff working in twenty-five schools. We argue that, although the Government’s Department of Education is committed to introducing compulsory registration of home-educated children, more is needed to strengthen local authority powers and to address the reasons why some parents choose, or feel pressured, to take their children out of school.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85150359837&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/S1474746423000052

DO - 10.1017/S1474746423000052

M3 - Article

SN - 1474-7464

VL - 42

JO - Social Policy and Society

JF - Social Policy and Society

IS - 1

ER -

Home Education in England: A Loose Thread in the Child Safeguarding Net?

Abstract

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this