How to measure the cost‐effectiveness of periodontal treatments

Chris Vernazza, Peter Heasman, Francesca Gaunt, Mark William Pennington

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

36 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

There is a need to measure efficiency of periodontal treatments. Efficiency questions can be addressed through a variety of economic evaluation techniques: cost minimization, cost-effectiveness, cost utility and cost–benefit analysis. Each of these techniques is outlined in this article, including a detailed discussion of different preference-based outcome (utility) measures. Despite the need, few analyses have been undertaken in periodontology. There are several issues in undertaking cost-effectiveness analyses specific to periodontology and these are examined in detail: outcome measures including patient-based vs. clinical measures of outcome; discounting or taking into account time preference for outcomes and costs; problems of costing, including the perspective taken in an analysis; interpreting the evidence, in particular using incremental cost-effectiveness ratios; and global variation in periodontal care delivery, including healthcare systems and the use of hygienists. The need for cost-effectiveness analysis in periodontology is explored further, and the need to involve a health economist in such an evaluation is underlined.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)138-146
Number of pages9
JournalPERIODONTOLOGY 2000
Volume60
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2012

Keywords

  • Cost effectiveness
  • periodontal disease

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'How to measure the cost‐effectiveness of periodontal treatments'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this