Abstract

Brain injury in preterm newborn infants is often attributed to hypoxia-ischemia even when neither hypoxia nor ischemia is documented, and many causative speculations are based on the same assumption. We review human and animal study contributions with their strengths and limitations, and conclude that - despite all the work done in human fetal neuropathology and developmental models in animals - the evidence remains unconvincing that hypoxemia, in the fetus or newborn infant, contributes appreciably to any encephalopathy of prematurity. Giving an inappropriate causal name to a disorder potentially limits the options for change, should our understanding of the etiologies advance. The only observationally-based title we think appropriate is 'encephalopathy of prematurity'. Future pathophysiological research should probably include appropriately designed epidemiology studies, highly active developmental processes, infection and other inflammatory stimuli, the immature immune system, long chain fatty acids and their transporters, and growth (neurotrophic) factors.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)120-125
JournalDevelopmental Medicine and Child Neurology
Early online date28 Jun 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2018

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Hypoxia-ischemia is not an antecedent of most preterm brain damage: the illusion of validity'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this