TY - JOUR
T1 - Identifying Bronchoconstriction from the Ratio of Diaphragm EMG to Tidal Volume
AU - He, Bai-Ting
AU - Luo, Ying-Mei
AU - Wang, Li-Shuang
AU - Chen, Yong-Yi
AU - Jolley, Caroline
AU - Steier, Joerg
AU - Moxham, John
AU - Polkey, Michael L
AU - Luo, Yuanming
N1 - Funding Information:
This study was supported by Chinese National Key Research Project (Grant No. 2016YFC1304200 ), Guangdong Major Project (Grant No. 2016B010108011 ), Independent Project of State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease (Grant No. SKLRD-Z-202011 ) and National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Number: 82070090 ).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021
Copyright:
Copyright 2021 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2021/9
Y1 - 2021/9
N2 - Background: A fall of ≥ 20 % in forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1) with a cumulative dose of histamine ≤ 7.8 μmol is considered to indicate bronchial hyperactivity, but no method exists for patients who cannot perform spirometry properly. Here we hypothesized that increases in respiratory central output measured by chest wall electromyography of the diaphragm (EMGdi-c) expressed as a function of tidal volume (EMGdi-c/VT) would have discriminative power to detect a ‘positive’ challenge test. Methods: In a physiological study EMGdi was recorded from esophageal electrode (EMGdi-e) in 16 asthma patients and 16 healthy subjects during a histamine challenge test. In a second study, EMGdi from chest wall surface electrodes (EMGdi-c) was measured during a histamine challenge in 44 asthma patients and 51 healthy subjects. VT was recorded from a digital flowmeter during both studies. Results: With histamine challenge test the change in EMGdi-e/VT in patients with asthma was significantly higher than that in healthy subjects (104.2 % ± 48.6 % vs 0.03 % ± 17.1 %, p < 0.001). Similarly there was a significant difference in the change of EMGdi-c/VT between patients with asthma and healthy subjects (90.5 % ± 75.5 % vs 2.4 % ± 21.7 %, p < 0.001). At the optimal cut-off point (29 % increase in EMGdi-c/VT), the area under the ROC curve (AUC) for detection of a positive test was 0.91 (p < 0.001) with sensitivity 86 % and specificity 92 %. Conclusions: We conclude that EMGdi-c/VT may be used as an alternative for the assessment of bronchial hypersensitivity and airway reversibility to differentiate patients with asthma from healthy subjects.
AB - Background: A fall of ≥ 20 % in forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1) with a cumulative dose of histamine ≤ 7.8 μmol is considered to indicate bronchial hyperactivity, but no method exists for patients who cannot perform spirometry properly. Here we hypothesized that increases in respiratory central output measured by chest wall electromyography of the diaphragm (EMGdi-c) expressed as a function of tidal volume (EMGdi-c/VT) would have discriminative power to detect a ‘positive’ challenge test. Methods: In a physiological study EMGdi was recorded from esophageal electrode (EMGdi-e) in 16 asthma patients and 16 healthy subjects during a histamine challenge test. In a second study, EMGdi from chest wall surface electrodes (EMGdi-c) was measured during a histamine challenge in 44 asthma patients and 51 healthy subjects. VT was recorded from a digital flowmeter during both studies. Results: With histamine challenge test the change in EMGdi-e/VT in patients with asthma was significantly higher than that in healthy subjects (104.2 % ± 48.6 % vs 0.03 % ± 17.1 %, p < 0.001). Similarly there was a significant difference in the change of EMGdi-c/VT between patients with asthma and healthy subjects (90.5 % ± 75.5 % vs 2.4 % ± 21.7 %, p < 0.001). At the optimal cut-off point (29 % increase in EMGdi-c/VT), the area under the ROC curve (AUC) for detection of a positive test was 0.91 (p < 0.001) with sensitivity 86 % and specificity 92 %. Conclusions: We conclude that EMGdi-c/VT may be used as an alternative for the assessment of bronchial hypersensitivity and airway reversibility to differentiate patients with asthma from healthy subjects.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85107153133&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.resp.2021.103692
DO - 10.1016/j.resp.2021.103692
M3 - Article
C2 - 34020067
SN - 1569-9048
VL - 291
SP - 103692
JO - RESPIRATORY PHYSIOLOGY AND NEUROBIOLOGY
JF - RESPIRATORY PHYSIOLOGY AND NEUROBIOLOGY
M1 - 103692
ER -