Identity and the limits of fair assessment

Rush T. Stewart*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In many assessment problems—aptitude testing, hiring decisions, appraisals of the risk of recidivism, evaluation of the credibility of testimonial sources, and so on—the fair treatment of different groups of individuals is an important goal. But individuals can be legitimately grouped in many different ways. Using a framework and fairness constraints explored in research on algorithmic fairness, I show that eliminating certain forms of bias across groups for one way of classifying individuals can make it impossible to eliminate such bias across groups for another way of dividing people up. And this point generalizes if we require merely that assessments be approximately bias-free. Moreover, even if the fairness constraints are satisfied for some given partitions of the population, the constraints can fail for the coarsest common refinement, that is, the partition generated by taking intersections of the elements of these coarser partitions. This shows that these prominent fairness constraints admit the possibility of forms of intersectional bias.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)415-442
Number of pages28
JournalJOURNAL OF THEORETICAL POLITICS
Volume34
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2022

Keywords

  • algorithmic fairness
  • bias
  • calibration
  • equalized odds
  • intersectionality

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Identity and the limits of fair assessment'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this