Impact of differences in acute respiratory distress syndrome randomised controlled trial inclusion and exclusion criteria: systematic review and meta-analysis

Rohit Saha, Benjamin Assouline, Georgina Mason, Abdel Douiri, Charlotte Summers, Manu Shankar-Hari

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Control-arm mortality varies between acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) RCTs. Methods: We systematically reviewed ARDS RCTs that commenced recruitment after publication of the American–European Consensus (AECC) definition (MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane central register of controlled trials; January 1994 to October 2020). We assessed concordance of RCT inclusion criteria to ARDS consensus definitions and whether exclusion criteria are strongly or poorly justified. We estimated the proportion of between-trial difference in control-arm 28-day mortality explained by the inclusion criteria and RCT design characteristics using meta-regression. Results: A literature search identified 43 709 records. One hundred and fifty ARDS RCTs were included; 146/150 (97.3%) RCTs defined ARDS inclusion criteria using AECC/Berlin definitions. Deviations from consensus definitions, primarily aimed at improving ARDS diagnostic certainty, frequently related to duration of hypoxaemia (117/146; 80.1%). Exclusion criteria could be grouped by rationale for selection into strongly or poorly justified criteria. Common poorly justified exclusions included pregnancy related, age, and comorbidities (infectious/immunosuppression, hepatic, renal, and human immunodeficiency virus/acquired immunodeficiency syndrome). Control-arm 28-day mortality varied between ARDS RCTs (mean: 29.8% [95% confidence interval: 27.0–32.7%; I 2=88.8%; τ 2=0.02; P<0.01]), and differed significantly between RCTs with different PaO 2:FiO 2 ratio inclusion thresholds (26.6–39.9 kPa vs <26.6 kPa; P<0.01). In a meta-regression model, inclusion criteria and RCT design characteristics accounted for 30.6% of between-trial difference (P<0.01). Conclusions: In most ARDS RCTs, consensus definitions are modified to use as inclusion criteria. Between-RCT mortality differences are mostly explained by the PaO 2:FiO 2 ratio threshold within the consensus definitions. An exclusion criteria framework can be applied when designing and reporting exclusion criteria in future ARDS RCTs.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)85-101
Number of pages17
JournalBritish Journal of Anaesthesia
Volume127
Issue number1
Early online date1 Apr 2021
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2021

Keywords

  • ARDS
  • exclusion
  • inclusion
  • mortality
  • randomised controlled trial

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Impact of differences in acute respiratory distress syndrome randomised controlled trial inclusion and exclusion criteria: systematic review and meta-analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this