TY - JOUR
T1 - Impact on mental health care and on mental health service users of the COVID-19 pandemic
T2 - a mixed methods survey of UK mental health care staff
AU - The COVID-19 Mental Health Policy Research Unit Group
AU - Johnson, Sonia
AU - Dalton-Locke, Christian
AU - Vera San Juan, Norha
AU - Foye, Una
AU - Oram, Sian
AU - Papamichail, Alexandra
AU - Landau, Sabine
AU - Rowan Olive, Rachel
AU - Jeynes, Tamar
AU - Shah, Prisha
AU - Sheridan Rains, Luke
AU - Lloyd-Evans, Brynmor
AU - Carr, Sarah
AU - Killaspy, Helen
AU - Gillard, Steve
AU - Simpson, Alan
AU - Bell, Andy
AU - Bentivegna, Francesca
AU - Botham, Joseph
AU - Edbrooke-Childs, Julian
AU - Goldsmith, Lucy
AU - Grünwald, Lisa
AU - Harju-Seppänen, Jasmine
AU - Hatch, Stephani
AU - Henderson, Claire
AU - Howard, Louise
AU - Lane, Rebecca
AU - Ledden, Sarah
AU - Leverton, Monica
AU - Lomani, Jo
AU - Lyons, Natasha
AU - McCrone, Paul
AU - Ntephe, Chukwuma U.
AU - Ocloo, Josephine Enyonam
AU - Osborn, David
AU - Pilling, Steve
AU - Poursanidou, Konstantina
AU - Scott, Hannah Rachel
AU - Steare, Thomas
AU - Stuart, Ruth
AU - Tomlin, André
AU - Turner, Kati
AU - Tzouvara, Vasiliki
N1 - Funding Information:
This paper presents independent research commissioned and funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Policy Research Programme, conducted by the NIHR Policy Research Unit (PRU) in Mental Health. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NIHR, the Department of Health and Social Care or its arm's length bodies, or other government departments. Acknowledgements
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020, The Author(s).
Copyright:
Copyright 2020 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2021/1
Y1 - 2021/1
N2 - PurposeThe COVID-19 pandemic has potential to disrupt and burden the mental health care system, and to magnify inequalities experienced by mental health service users.MethodsWe investigated staff reports regarding the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic in its early weeks on mental health care and mental health service users in the UK using a mixed methods online survey. Recruitment channels included professional associations and networks, charities, and social media. Quantitative findings were reported with descriptive statistics, and content analysis conducted for qualitative data.Results2,180 staff from a range of sectors, professions, and specialties participated. Immediate infection control concerns were highly salient for inpatient staff, new ways of working for community staff. Multiple rapid adaptations and innovations in response to the crisis were described, especially remote working. This was cautiously welcomed but found successful in only some clinical situations. Staff had specific concerns about many groups of service users, including people whose conditions are exacerbated by pandemic anxieties and social disruptions; people experiencing loneliness, domestic abuse and family conflict; those unable to understand and follow social distancing requirements; and those who cannot engage with remote care.ConclusionThis overview of staff concerns and experiences in the early COVID-19 pandemic suggests directions for further research and service development: we suggest that how to combine infection control and a therapeutic environment in hospital, and how to achieve effective and targeted tele-health implementation in the community, should be priorities. The limitations of our convenience sample must be noted.
AB - PurposeThe COVID-19 pandemic has potential to disrupt and burden the mental health care system, and to magnify inequalities experienced by mental health service users.MethodsWe investigated staff reports regarding the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic in its early weeks on mental health care and mental health service users in the UK using a mixed methods online survey. Recruitment channels included professional associations and networks, charities, and social media. Quantitative findings were reported with descriptive statistics, and content analysis conducted for qualitative data.Results2,180 staff from a range of sectors, professions, and specialties participated. Immediate infection control concerns were highly salient for inpatient staff, new ways of working for community staff. Multiple rapid adaptations and innovations in response to the crisis were described, especially remote working. This was cautiously welcomed but found successful in only some clinical situations. Staff had specific concerns about many groups of service users, including people whose conditions are exacerbated by pandemic anxieties and social disruptions; people experiencing loneliness, domestic abuse and family conflict; those unable to understand and follow social distancing requirements; and those who cannot engage with remote care.ConclusionThis overview of staff concerns and experiences in the early COVID-19 pandemic suggests directions for further research and service development: we suggest that how to combine infection control and a therapeutic environment in hospital, and how to achieve effective and targeted tele-health implementation in the community, should be priorities. The limitations of our convenience sample must be noted.
KW - Coronavirus
KW - COVID-19
KW - Mental health care
KW - Mental health services
KW - Mental health staff
KW - Pandemic
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85089974579&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00127-020-01927-4
U2 - 10.1007/s00127-020-01927-4
DO - 10.1007/s00127-020-01927-4
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85089974579
SN - 0933-7954
VL - 56
SP - 25
EP - 37
JO - Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
JF - Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
IS - 1
ER -