Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
M. C. White, K. Randall, N. F.E. Capo-Chichi, F. Sodogas, S. Quenum, K. Wright, K. L. Close, S. Russ, N. Sevdalis, A. J. M. Leather
Original language | Spanish |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | e91-e102 |
Number of pages | 12 |
Journal | British Journal of Surgery |
Volume | 106 |
Issue number | 2 |
Early online date | 8 Jan 2019 |
DOIs | |
Accepted/In press | 1 Oct 2018 |
E-pub ahead of print | 8 Jan 2019 |
Published | Jan 2019 |
Additional links |
Implementation and evaluation of_WHITE_Accepted1October2018_GOLD VoR (CC BY-NC-ND)
Implementation_and_evaluation_of_WHITE_Accepted1October2018_GOLD_VoR_CC_BY_NC_ND_.pdf, 665 KB, application/pdf
Uploaded date:01 Apr 2019
Version:Final published version
Licence:CC BY-NC-ND
Implementation and evaluation of nationwide scale‐up of the Surgical Safety Checklist - White - 2019
Implementation_and_evaluation_of_nationwide_scale_up_of_the_Surgical_Safety_Checklist_White_2019.pdf, 272 KB, application/pdf
Uploaded date:14 Jan 2019
BACKGROUND: The WHO Surgical Safety Checklist improves surgical outcomes, but evidence and theoretical frameworks for successful implementation in low-income countries remain lacking. Based on previous research in Madagascar, a nationwide checklist implementation in Benin was designed and evaluated longitudinally. METHODS: This study had a longitudinal embedded mixed-methods design. The well validated Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) was used to structure the approach and evaluate the implementation. Thirty-six hospitals received 3-day multidisciplinary training and 4-month follow-up. Seventeen hospitals were sampled purposively for evaluation at 12-18 months. The primary outcome was sustainability of checklist use at 12-18 months measured by questionnaire. Secondary outcomes were CFIR-derived implementation outcomes, measured using the WHO Behaviourally Anchored Rating Scale (WHOBARS), safety questionnaires and focus groups. RESULTS: At 12-18 months, 86·0 per cent of participants (86 of 100) reported checklist use compared with 31·1 per cent (169 of 543) before training and 88·8 per cent (158 of 178) at 4 months. There was high-fidelity use (median WHOBARS score 5·0 of 7; use of basic safety processes ranged from 85·0 to 99·0 per cent), and high penetration shown by a significant improvement in hospital safety culture (adapted Human Factors Attitude Questionnaire scores of 76·7, 81·1 and 82·2 per cent before, and at 4 and 12-18 months after training respectively; P < 0·001). Acceptability, adoption, appropriateness and feasibility scored 9·6-9·8 of 10. This approach incorporated 31 of 36 CFIR implementation constructs successfully. CONCLUSION: This study shows successfully sustained nationwide checklist implementation using a validated implementation framework.
King's College London - Homepage
© 2020 King's College London | Strand | London WC2R 2LS | England | United Kingdom | Tel +44 (0)20 7836 5454