Implementation and evaluation of recovery-oriented practice interventions for people with mental illness in Asia: An integrative review

Chonmanan Khanthavudh; Annmarie Grealish; Vasiliki Tzouvara; Mary Leamy

doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2023.104591

Implementation and evaluation of recovery-oriented practice interventions for people with mental illness in Asia: An integrative review

Chonmanan Khanthavudh^*, Annmarie Grealish, Vasiliki Tzouvara, Mary Leamy

^*Corresponding author for this work

Care in Long Term Conditions

Research output: Contribution to journal › Review article › peer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Recovery is a process involving empowering individuals to take control of their lives and develop meaningful and purposeful life, regardless of whether their mental health symptoms persist. Recovery-oriented practice has been widely implemented, particularly in Anglophone countries, during the past two decades. Mental health recovery in Asia is also moving towards recovery-oriented practice. Little is known about how recovery-oriented interventions originating in the West have been implemented and evaluated in Asian contexts. Objective: This review aimed to identify 1) types of recovery-oriented practice interventions that have been implemented in Asia, 2) how they have been culturally adapted, 3) barriers and facilitators to implementation, and 4) how the interventions have been evaluated. Design: This is an integrative review. Methods: This integrative review followed Whittemore and Knafl's five-stage framework. Six electronic databases (e.g., PsycINFO, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library) were systematically searched from their inception to January 2022 to identify eligible studies published in English language. The key search terms included “mental illness”, “recovery-oriented intervention”, and “Asia”. Studies reporting on implementation and evaluation of recovery-focused interventions in Asian settings were eligible. Quality assessment and narrative synthesis were subsequently undertaken. Results: Thirty-eight studies were included. Seven main types of recovery-oriented intervention were identified: (1) peer programmes; (2) illness management and recovery; (3) individual placement and support; (4) strength model case management; (5) clubhouse model; (6) wellness recovery action plan and (7) psychiatric advance directive, alongside several novel recovery programmes. Studies reported cultural adaptations for language, content, cultural norms, religious beliefs, family, and local context. Barriers to implementation included a poor understanding of recovery concepts and inadequate organisational resources. A range of clinical and personal recovery outcome measures were reported. Conclusions: Recovery-oriented interventions are increasing in Asia, with nearly half of reviewed studies featuring cultural adaptations. However, research is geographically skewed, and more rigorously conducted studies are needed across a wider range of Asian countries. Registration: This review was registered with the PROSPERO International prospective register of systematic reviews (CRD42022310049). Tweetable abstract: Recovery-oriented practice interventions for people with mental illness are on the rise in Asia @chonmananNN.

Original language	English
Article number	104591
Journal	International Journal of Nursing Studies
Volume	147
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2023.104591
Publication status	Published - 28 Aug 2023

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Access to Document

10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2023.104591Licence: CC BY-ND

Cite this

@article{8d378e57454341ab905e9109b9080c41,

title = "Implementation and evaluation of recovery-oriented practice interventions for people with mental illness in Asia: An integrative review ",

abstract = "Background: Recovery is a process involving empowering individuals to take control of their lives and develop meaningful and purposeful life, regardless of whether their mental health symptoms persist. Recovery-oriented practice has been widely implemented, particularly in Anglophone countries, during the past two decades. Mental health recovery in Asia is also moving towards recovery-oriented practice. Little is known about how recovery-oriented interventions originating in the West have been implemented and evaluated in Asian contexts. Objective: This review aimed to identify 1) types of recovery-oriented practice interventions that have been implemented in Asia, 2) how they have been culturally adapted, 3) barriers and facilitators to implementation, and 4) how the interventions have been evaluated. Design: This is an integrative review. Methods: This integrative review followed Whittemore and Knafl's five-stage framework. Six electronic databases (e.g., PsycINFO, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library) were systematically searched from their inception to January 2022 to identify eligible studies published in English language. The key search terms included “mental illness”, “recovery-oriented intervention”, and “Asia”. Studies reporting on implementation and evaluation of recovery-focused interventions in Asian settings were eligible. Quality assessment and narrative synthesis were subsequently undertaken. Results: Thirty-eight studies were included. Seven main types of recovery-oriented intervention were identified: (1) peer programmes; (2) illness management and recovery; (3) individual placement and support; (4) strength model case management; (5) clubhouse model; (6) wellness recovery action plan and (7) psychiatric advance directive, alongside several novel recovery programmes. Studies reported cultural adaptations for language, content, cultural norms, religious beliefs, family, and local context. Barriers to implementation included a poor understanding of recovery concepts and inadequate organisational resources. A range of clinical and personal recovery outcome measures were reported. Conclusions: Recovery-oriented interventions are increasing in Asia, with nearly half of reviewed studies featuring cultural adaptations. However, research is geographically skewed, and more rigorously conducted studies are needed across a wider range of Asian countries. Registration: This review was registered with the PROSPERO International prospective register of systematic reviews (CRD42022310049). Tweetable abstract: Recovery-oriented practice interventions for people with mental illness are on the rise in Asia @chonmananNN.",

author = "Chonmanan Khanthavudh and Annmarie Grealish and Vasiliki Tzouvara and Mary Leamy",

note = "Funding Information: We wish to acknowledge Dr. Samantha Coster, our colleague at King's College London, for her support and guidance in editing this article. Additionally, the first author would like to express gratitude to Ramathibodi School of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University for providing the PhD scholarship. Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2023 The Authors",

year = "2023",

month = aug,

day = "28",

doi = "10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2023.104591",

language = "English",

volume = "147",

journal = "International Journal of Nursing Studies",

issn = "0020-7489",

publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Implementation and evaluation of recovery-oriented practice interventions for people with mental illness in Asia

T2 - An integrative review

AU - Khanthavudh, Chonmanan

AU - Grealish, Annmarie

AU - Tzouvara, Vasiliki

AU - Leamy, Mary

N1 - Funding Information: We wish to acknowledge Dr. Samantha Coster, our colleague at King's College London, for her support and guidance in editing this article. Additionally, the first author would like to express gratitude to Ramathibodi School of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University for providing the PhD scholarship. Publisher Copyright: © 2023 The Authors

PY - 2023/8/28

Y1 - 2023/8/28

N2 - Background: Recovery is a process involving empowering individuals to take control of their lives and develop meaningful and purposeful life, regardless of whether their mental health symptoms persist. Recovery-oriented practice has been widely implemented, particularly in Anglophone countries, during the past two decades. Mental health recovery in Asia is also moving towards recovery-oriented practice. Little is known about how recovery-oriented interventions originating in the West have been implemented and evaluated in Asian contexts. Objective: This review aimed to identify 1) types of recovery-oriented practice interventions that have been implemented in Asia, 2) how they have been culturally adapted, 3) barriers and facilitators to implementation, and 4) how the interventions have been evaluated. Design: This is an integrative review. Methods: This integrative review followed Whittemore and Knafl's five-stage framework. Six electronic databases (e.g., PsycINFO, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library) were systematically searched from their inception to January 2022 to identify eligible studies published in English language. The key search terms included “mental illness”, “recovery-oriented intervention”, and “Asia”. Studies reporting on implementation and evaluation of recovery-focused interventions in Asian settings were eligible. Quality assessment and narrative synthesis were subsequently undertaken. Results: Thirty-eight studies were included. Seven main types of recovery-oriented intervention were identified: (1) peer programmes; (2) illness management and recovery; (3) individual placement and support; (4) strength model case management; (5) clubhouse model; (6) wellness recovery action plan and (7) psychiatric advance directive, alongside several novel recovery programmes. Studies reported cultural adaptations for language, content, cultural norms, religious beliefs, family, and local context. Barriers to implementation included a poor understanding of recovery concepts and inadequate organisational resources. A range of clinical and personal recovery outcome measures were reported. Conclusions: Recovery-oriented interventions are increasing in Asia, with nearly half of reviewed studies featuring cultural adaptations. However, research is geographically skewed, and more rigorously conducted studies are needed across a wider range of Asian countries. Registration: This review was registered with the PROSPERO International prospective register of systematic reviews (CRD42022310049). Tweetable abstract: Recovery-oriented practice interventions for people with mental illness are on the rise in Asia @chonmananNN.

AB - Background: Recovery is a process involving empowering individuals to take control of their lives and develop meaningful and purposeful life, regardless of whether their mental health symptoms persist. Recovery-oriented practice has been widely implemented, particularly in Anglophone countries, during the past two decades. Mental health recovery in Asia is also moving towards recovery-oriented practice. Little is known about how recovery-oriented interventions originating in the West have been implemented and evaluated in Asian contexts. Objective: This review aimed to identify 1) types of recovery-oriented practice interventions that have been implemented in Asia, 2) how they have been culturally adapted, 3) barriers and facilitators to implementation, and 4) how the interventions have been evaluated. Design: This is an integrative review. Methods: This integrative review followed Whittemore and Knafl's five-stage framework. Six electronic databases (e.g., PsycINFO, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library) were systematically searched from their inception to January 2022 to identify eligible studies published in English language. The key search terms included “mental illness”, “recovery-oriented intervention”, and “Asia”. Studies reporting on implementation and evaluation of recovery-focused interventions in Asian settings were eligible. Quality assessment and narrative synthesis were subsequently undertaken. Results: Thirty-eight studies were included. Seven main types of recovery-oriented intervention were identified: (1) peer programmes; (2) illness management and recovery; (3) individual placement and support; (4) strength model case management; (5) clubhouse model; (6) wellness recovery action plan and (7) psychiatric advance directive, alongside several novel recovery programmes. Studies reported cultural adaptations for language, content, cultural norms, religious beliefs, family, and local context. Barriers to implementation included a poor understanding of recovery concepts and inadequate organisational resources. A range of clinical and personal recovery outcome measures were reported. Conclusions: Recovery-oriented interventions are increasing in Asia, with nearly half of reviewed studies featuring cultural adaptations. However, research is geographically skewed, and more rigorously conducted studies are needed across a wider range of Asian countries. Registration: This review was registered with the PROSPERO International prospective register of systematic reviews (CRD42022310049). Tweetable abstract: Recovery-oriented practice interventions for people with mental illness are on the rise in Asia @chonmananNN.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85170575363&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2023.104591

DO - 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2023.104591

M3 - Review article

SN - 0020-7489

VL - 147

JO - International Journal of Nursing Studies

JF - International Journal of Nursing Studies

M1 - 104591

ER -

Implementation and evaluation of recovery-oriented practice interventions for people with mental illness in Asia: An integrative review

Abstract

UN SDGs

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this