Abstract
Reputation enables customers to select between providers, and balance risk against other aspects of service provision. For new providers that have yet to establish a track record, negative ratings can significantly impact on their chances of being selected. Existing work has shown that malicious or inaccurate reviews, and subjective differences, can be accounted for. However, an honest balanced review of service pro- vision may still be an unreliable predictor of future performance if the circumstances differ. Specifically, mitigating circumstances may have affected previous provision. For example, while a delivery service may generally be reliable, a particular delivery may be delayed by unexpected flooding. A common way to ameliorate such effects is by weighting the influence of past events on reputation by their recency. In this paper, we argue that it is more effective to query detailed records of service provision, using patterns that describe the circumstances to determine the significance of previous interactions.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | Advances in Social Computing and Multiagent Systems |
Pages | 77-93 |
Volume | 541 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 15 Nov 2015 |
Keywords
- Reputation
- Provenance
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Incorporating Mitigating Circumstances into Reputation Assessment'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Datasets
-
Source code and data underlying results published in Accounting for Circumstances in Reputation Assessment (Extended Abstract)
Miles, S. & Griffiths, N., GitHub, 29 May 2015
DOI: 10.18742/16473612
Dataset