Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to present a case study describing the progress that is being made in one city in England to increase access to Care Act 2014 assessments and personal budgets among people with experiences of homelessness and multiple exclusion. Design/methodology/approach: A case study employing a “study group” to describe and reflect on local development work. Findings: The authors focus on the “systems change” activity that was undertaken by one voluntary sector partnership project to address issues of referral and access to adult social care. This included the development of a “Multiple Needs Toolkit” designed to support voluntary sector workers to communicate more effectively with adult social care around the application of the new Care Act 2014 eligibility thresholds. The authors discuss the role of “persistent advocacy” in increasing access to assessments and also the limitations of this as regard the potential for poorer joint working. Originality/value: Throughout, the authors draw on the “ambiguity-conflict” model of policy implementation to assess if the learning from this single case study might be applied elsewhere.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1-12 |
| Number of pages | 12 |
| Journal | Housing, Care and Support |
| Volume | 21 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| Early online date | Mar 2018 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | E-pub ahead of print - Mar 2018 |
Keywords
- Ambiguity-conflict model
- Care Act 2014
- Eligibility
- Homelessness
- Hospital discharge
- Intermediate care
- Medical respite
- Personalization
- Realist systematic review
- Systems change
- Transition of care
