Indicators of esteem: gender and prestige in academic work

Kelly Coate*, Camille Kandiko Howson

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

70 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The continued gender imbalance in senior positions in higher education is a problem that persists despite decades of feminist research and publications in the area, as well as interventions in many countries to promote the advancement of women. In this article we view the issue of gender inequality through the lens of the prestige economy, which suggests that academics are motivated by prestige factors accrued through advancement in their careers. Prestige, authority and status, we suggest, may be more easily acquired by male academics. We draw on a case study of one institution in the Rppublic of Ireland, including data from a survey on academic careers (n = 269), to explore how the concept of prestige is gendered. We explore the cumulative effect of four themes: homosociability; non-transparency of criteria; academic workload balance; and self-promotion.
Original languageEnglish
Number of pages19
JournalBritish Journal of Sociology of Education
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 2014

Keywords

  • academic careers
  • gender
  • higher education
  • inequalities
  • prestige

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Indicators of esteem: gender and prestige in academic work'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this