Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
Insight is a useful construct in clinical assessments if used wisely. / David, Anthony; Ariyo, Kevin.
In: Journal of Medical Ethics, 2020.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Insight is a useful construct in clinical assessments if used wisely
AU - David, Anthony
AU - Ariyo, Kevin
N1 - © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - Medical ethicist, Guidry-Grimes has critically reviewed the concept of insight, voicing concerns that it lacks consensus as to its components and that it undermines patient perspectives. We respond by briefly summarising research over the last 30 years that she overlooks which has helped establish the clinical validity of the construct. This includes the adoption of standardised assessment tools-at least in research-and longitudinal and cross-sectional studies quantifying associations with psychopathological, clinical and cognitive measures. We also make the distinction between the current standards for assessing decision-making capacity leading to, where appropriate, involuntary treatment in clinical and medico-legal settings which in most legislations do not include insight assessments, and anecdotal reports of the use and misuse of 'lack of insight' as a proxy for more comprehensive evaluation. We conclude by encouraging a broader view of insight akin to self-knowledge.
AB - Medical ethicist, Guidry-Grimes has critically reviewed the concept of insight, voicing concerns that it lacks consensus as to its components and that it undermines patient perspectives. We respond by briefly summarising research over the last 30 years that she overlooks which has helped establish the clinical validity of the construct. This includes the adoption of standardised assessment tools-at least in research-and longitudinal and cross-sectional studies quantifying associations with psychopathological, clinical and cognitive measures. We also make the distinction between the current standards for assessing decision-making capacity leading to, where appropriate, involuntary treatment in clinical and medico-legal settings which in most legislations do not include insight assessments, and anecdotal reports of the use and misuse of 'lack of insight' as a proxy for more comprehensive evaluation. We conclude by encouraging a broader view of insight akin to self-knowledge.
KW - capacity
KW - decision-making
KW - involuntary civil commitment
KW - mentally ill and disabled persons
KW - psychiatry
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85083396610&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1136/medethics-2020-106128
DO - 10.1136/medethics-2020-106128
M3 - Article
C2 - 32273295
JO - Journal of Medical Ethics
JF - Journal of Medical Ethics
SN - 0306-6800
M1 - 32273295
ER -
King's College London - Homepage
© 2020 King's College London | Strand | London WC2R 2LS | England | United Kingdom | Tel +44 (0)20 7836 5454