King's College London

Research portal

Intermittent energy restriction is comparable to continuous energy restriction for cardiometabolic health in adults with central obesity: a randomized controlled trial; The Met-IER Study

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ana M Pinto, Claire Bordoli, Luke Buckner, Curie Kim, Polly Kaplan, Ines Del Arenal, Emma Jeffcock, Wendy L Hall

Original languageEnglish
JournalCLINICAL NUTRITION
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 19 Jul 2019

King's Authors

Abstract

Background & aims: Short bouts of severe energy restriction may have additional, beneficial cardiometabolic effects beyond that of weight loss. We aimed to assess the short-term effects of intermittent fasting on insulin sensitivity and related cardiometabolic mechanisms. Methods: This parallel arm, randomized controlled trial compared the short-term effects of intermittent and continuous energy restriction (IER and CER) diets on markers of cardiometabolic health in individuals with central obesity, aiming for equivalent weight loss on both diets. Outcomes were assessed in non-smoking men and women (35–75 y), following 4-wk IER (48 h 600 kcal/d followed by 5-day healthy eating advice) or CER diets (-500 kcal/d healthy eating advice). The primary outcome was the revised quantitative insulin sensitivity check index (R-QUICKI), an indirect estimate of insulin sensitivity. Secondary outcomes included ambulatory blood pressure (ABP), indicators of sympathetic activity (heart rate variability (HRV) and normetanephrine), and markers of glucose homeostasis/insulin resistance, adiposity, lipids and inflammation. Results: Forty-three participants completed the study. Reductions in body weight were equivalent in both groups: mean loss (%) -2.6; 95% CI -3.3, -1.9 and -2.9; -3.6, -2.1 for CER and IER, respectively, P = 0.464). R-QUICKI increased following IER and CER, with no between-diet differences (overall mean increase (%) 6.6; 3.6, 9.6). Fasting plasma glucose concentrations decreased after CER but not after IER (mean difference CER - IER - 4.8% (0.7, 8.9), P<0.05) and fasting plasma non-esterified fatty acid concentrations were lower after IER compared to CER (mean difference CER - IER 0.15 mmol/L (0.06, 0.24), P<0.005). There were no differences in lipids, adipokine/inflammatory markers, ABP or HRV between diets. Conclusions: Short-term CER or IER diets are comparable in their effects on most markers of cardiometabolic risk, although adaptive changes in glucose and fatty acid metabolism occur. This study is registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT02679989.

View graph of relations

© 2018 King's College London | Strand | London WC2R 2LS | England | United Kingdom | Tel +44 (0)20 7836 5454