International Relations Scholarship at 100: Publicism, Truth-Pluralism and the Usefulness Problem.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

347 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Revisionist studies have shown that stories about a 1919 IR disciplinary birthdate function to obfuscate the history of international thought. 1919 has nonetheless cast a long shadow over how the usefulness of professional scholarship in International Relations has been conceptualised. In this article, I trace how the 1919 birth-story orientated disciplinary constructions of the usefulness of the field as they relate to pluralist approaches to truth-seeking in IR. I argue that the centenary of 1919, in reminding us of the publicist as well as pluralist scholarship of the inter-war years, should foster a drive towards better communication with global IR’s publics and, in this way, ensure that the discipline is fitted to the so-called post-truth era.
Original languageEnglish
JournalNew Perspectives. Interdisciplinary Journal of Central & East European Politics and International Relations
Early online date27 Feb 2020
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 27 Feb 2020

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'International Relations Scholarship at 100: Publicism, Truth-Pluralism and the Usefulness Problem.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this