King's College London

Research portal

Internationalized Regimes: A second dimension of regime hybridity

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Standard

Internationalized Regimes : A second dimension of regime hybridity. / Tansey, Oisín.

In: democratization, Vol. 20, No. 7, 2013, p. 1169-1194.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Harvard

Tansey, O 2013, 'Internationalized Regimes: A second dimension of regime hybridity', democratization, vol. 20, no. 7, pp. 1169-1194. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2012.683662

APA

Tansey, O. (2013). Internationalized Regimes: A second dimension of regime hybridity. democratization, 20(7), 1169-1194. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2012.683662

Vancouver

Tansey O. Internationalized Regimes: A second dimension of regime hybridity. democratization. 2013;20(7):1169-1194. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2012.683662

Author

Tansey, Oisín. / Internationalized Regimes : A second dimension of regime hybridity. In: democratization. 2013 ; Vol. 20, No. 7. pp. 1169-1194.

Bibtex Download

@article{27ae55452ef545cd8b04786721f71c81,
title = "Internationalized Regimes: A second dimension of regime hybridity",
abstract = "Traditional approaches have conceptualized political regimes almost exclusively with reference to domestic-level political factors. However, many current and historical political regimes have entailed a major role for international actors, and in some cases the external influence has been so great that regimes have become internationalized. This article explores the concept of {\textquoteleft}internationalized regimes{\textquoteright} and argues that they should be seen as a distinct form of hybrid regime type that demonstrates a distinct dimension of hybridity. Until now, regime hybridity has been conceived along a single dimension of domestic politics: the level of competitiveness. Yet, some regimes are characterized by a different type of hybridity, in which domestic and international authority are found together within a single political system. The article explores the dynamics of internationalized regimes within three settings, those of international occupation, international administration and informal empire.",
author = "Ois{\'i}n Tansey",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1080/13510347.2012.683662",
language = "English",
volume = "20",
pages = "1169--1194",
journal = "democratization",
issn = "1351-0347",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "7",

}

RIS (suitable for import to EndNote) Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Internationalized Regimes

T2 - A second dimension of regime hybridity

AU - Tansey, Oisín

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - Traditional approaches have conceptualized political regimes almost exclusively with reference to domestic-level political factors. However, many current and historical political regimes have entailed a major role for international actors, and in some cases the external influence has been so great that regimes have become internationalized. This article explores the concept of ‘internationalized regimes’ and argues that they should be seen as a distinct form of hybrid regime type that demonstrates a distinct dimension of hybridity. Until now, regime hybridity has been conceived along a single dimension of domestic politics: the level of competitiveness. Yet, some regimes are characterized by a different type of hybridity, in which domestic and international authority are found together within a single political system. The article explores the dynamics of internationalized regimes within three settings, those of international occupation, international administration and informal empire.

AB - Traditional approaches have conceptualized political regimes almost exclusively with reference to domestic-level political factors. However, many current and historical political regimes have entailed a major role for international actors, and in some cases the external influence has been so great that regimes have become internationalized. This article explores the concept of ‘internationalized regimes’ and argues that they should be seen as a distinct form of hybrid regime type that demonstrates a distinct dimension of hybridity. Until now, regime hybridity has been conceived along a single dimension of domestic politics: the level of competitiveness. Yet, some regimes are characterized by a different type of hybridity, in which domestic and international authority are found together within a single political system. The article explores the dynamics of internationalized regimes within three settings, those of international occupation, international administration and informal empire.

U2 - 10.1080/13510347.2012.683662

DO - 10.1080/13510347.2012.683662

M3 - Article

VL - 20

SP - 1169

EP - 1194

JO - democratization

JF - democratization

SN - 1351-0347

IS - 7

ER -

View graph of relations

© 2020 King's College London | Strand | London WC2R 2LS | England | United Kingdom | Tel +44 (0)20 7836 5454