Introducing the productive operating theatre programme in urology theatre suites

Kamran Ahmed*, Nuzhath Khan, Deirdre Anderson, Jonathan Watkiss, Benjamin Challacombe, Mohammad Shamim Khan, Prokar Dasgupta, Declan Cahill

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    6 Citations (Scopus)


    Background: The Productive Operating Theatre (TPOT) is a theatre improvement programme designed by the UK National Health Service. The aim of this study was to evaluate the implementation of TPOT in urology operating theatres and identify obstacles to running an ideal operating list. Method: TPOT was introduced in two urology operating theatres in September 2010. A multidisciplinary team identified and audited obstacles to the running of an ideal operating list. A brief/debrief system was introduced and patient satisfaction was recorded via a structured questionnaire. The primary outcome measure was the effect of TPOT on start and overrun times. Results: Start times: 39-41% increase in operating lists starting on time from September 2010 to June 2011, involving 1,365 cases. Overrun times: Declined by 832 min between March 2010 and March 2011. The cost of monthly overrun decreased from September 2010 to June 2011 by GBP 510-3,030. Patient experience: A high degree of satisfaction regarding level of care (77%), staff hygiene (71%) and information provided (72%), while negative comments regarding staff shortages and environment/facilities were recorded. Conclusions: TPOT has helped identify key obstacles and shown improvements in efficiency measures such as start/overrun times.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)417-421
    Number of pages5
    JournalUrologia Internationalis
    Issue number4
    Publication statusPublished - May 2013


    • Patient safety
    • Efficiency
    • Cost effectiveness
    • Adverse event
    • Communication


    Dive into the research topics of 'Introducing the productive operating theatre programme in urology theatre suites'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this