Introduction to a Culturally Sensitive Measure of Well-Being: Combining Life Satisfaction and Interdependent Happiness Across 49 Different Cultures

Kuba Krys; Brian W. Haas; Eric Raymond Igou; Aleksandra Kosiarczyk; Agata Kocimska-Bortnowska; Anna Kwiatkowska; Vivian Miu Chi Lun; Fridanna Maricchiolo; Joonha Park; Iva Poláčková Šolcová; David Sirlopú; Yukiko Uchida; Christin Melanie Vauclair; Vivian L. Vignoles; John M. Zelenski; Mladen Adamovic; Charity S. Akotia; Isabelle Albert; Lily Appoh; D. M.Arévalo Mira; Arno Baltin; Patrick Denoux; Alejandra Domínguez-Espinosa; Carla Sofia Esteves; Vladimer Gamsakhurdia; Márta Fülöp; Ragna B. Garðarsdóttir; Alin Gavreliuc; Diana Boer; David O. Igbokwe; İdil Işık; Natalia Kascakova; Lucie Klůzová Kráčmarová; Natasza Kosakowska-Berezecka; Olga Kostoula; Nicole Kronberger; J. Hannah Lee; Xinhui Liu; Magdalena Łużniak-Piecha; Arina Malyonova; Pablo Eduardo Barrientos; Tamara Mohorić; Oriana Mosca; Elke Murdock; Nur Fariza Mustaffa; Martin Nader; Azar Nadi; Ayu Okvitawanli; Yvette van Osch; Vassilis Pavlopoulos; Zoran Pavlović; Muhammad Rizwan; Vladyslav Romashov; Espen Røysamb; Ruta Sargautyte; Beate Schwarz; Heyla A. Selim; Ursula Serdarevich; Maria Stogianni; Chien Ru Sun; Julien Teyssier; Wijnand A.P. van Tilburg; Claudio Torres; Cai Xing; Michael Harris Bond

doi:10.1007/s10902-022-00588-1

Introduction to a Culturally Sensitive Measure of Well-Being: Combining Life Satisfaction and Interdependent Happiness Across 49 Different Cultures

Kuba Krys^*, Brian W. Haas, Eric Raymond Igou, Aleksandra Kosiarczyk, Agata Kocimska-Bortnowska, Anna Kwiatkowska, Vivian Miu Chi Lun, Fridanna Maricchiolo, Joonha Park, Iva Poláčková Šolcová, David Sirlopú, Yukiko Uchida, Christin Melanie Vauclair, Vivian L. Vignoles, John M. Zelenski, Mladen Adamovic, Charity S. Akotia, Isabelle Albert, Lily Appoh, D. M.Arévalo MiraArno Baltin, Patrick Denoux, Alejandra Domínguez-Espinosa, Carla Sofia Esteves, Vladimer Gamsakhurdia, Márta Fülöp, Ragna B. Garðarsdóttir, Alin Gavreliuc, Diana Boer, David O. Igbokwe, İdil Işık, Natalia Kascakova, Lucie Klůzová Kráčmarová, Natasza Kosakowska-Berezecka, Olga Kostoula, Nicole Kronberger, J. Hannah Lee, Xinhui Liu, Magdalena Łużniak-Piecha, Arina Malyonova, Pablo Eduardo Barrientos, Tamara Mohorić, Oriana Mosca, Elke Murdock, Nur Fariza Mustaffa, Martin Nader, Azar Nadi, Ayu Okvitawanli, Yvette van Osch, Vassilis Pavlopoulos, Zoran Pavlović, Muhammad Rizwan, Vladyslav Romashov, Espen Røysamb, Ruta Sargautyte, Beate Schwarz, Heyla A. Selim, Ursula Serdarevich, Maria Stogianni, Chien Ru Sun, Julien Teyssier, Wijnand A.P. van Tilburg, Claudio Torres, Cai Xing, Michael Harris Bond

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

How can one conclude that well-being is higher in country A than country B, when well-being is being measured according to the way people in country A think about well-being? We address this issue by proposing a new culturally sensitive method to comparing societal levels of well-being. We support our reasoning with data on life satisfaction and interdependent happiness focusing on individual and family, collected mostly from students, across forty-nine countries. We demonstrate that the relative idealization of the two types of well-being varies across cultural contexts and are associated with culturally different models of selfhood. Furthermore, we show that rankings of societal well-being based on life satisfaction tend to underestimate the contribution from interdependent happiness. We introduce a new culturally sensitive method for calculating societal well-being, and examine its construct validity by testing for associations with the experience of emotions and with individualism-collectivism. This new culturally sensitive approach represents a slight, yet important improvement in measuring well-being.

Original language	English
Journal	Journal Of Happiness Studies
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-022-00588-1
Publication status	Accepted/In press - 2022

Keywords

Cultural sensitivity
Culture
Happiness
Interdependent happiness
Life satisfaction
Self-construals
Selfhoods
Well-being

Access to Document

10.1007/s10902-022-00588-1

Cite this

Krys, K., Haas, B. W., Igou, E. R., Kosiarczyk, A., Kocimska-Bortnowska, A., Kwiatkowska, A., Lun, V. M. C., Maricchiolo, F., Park, J., Šolcová, I. P., Sirlopú, D., Uchida, Y., Vauclair, C. M., Vignoles, V. L., Zelenski, J. M., Adamovic, M., Akotia, C. S., Albert, I., Appoh, L., ... Bond, M. H. (Accepted/In press). Introduction to a Culturally Sensitive Measure of Well-Being: Combining Life Satisfaction and Interdependent Happiness Across 49 Different Cultures. Journal Of Happiness Studies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-022-00588-1

@article{c500212836dc4baca1db0ab000177702,

title = "Introduction to a Culturally Sensitive Measure of Well-Being: Combining Life Satisfaction and Interdependent Happiness Across 49 Different Cultures",

abstract = "How can one conclude that well-being is higher in country A than country B, when well-being is being measured according to the way people in country A think about well-being? We address this issue by proposing a new culturally sensitive method to comparing societal levels of well-being. We support our reasoning with data on life satisfaction and interdependent happiness focusing on individual and family, collected mostly from students, across forty-nine countries. We demonstrate that the relative idealization of the two types of well-being varies across cultural contexts and are associated with culturally different models of selfhood. Furthermore, we show that rankings of societal well-being based on life satisfaction tend to underestimate the contribution from interdependent happiness. We introduce a new culturally sensitive method for calculating societal well-being, and examine its construct validity by testing for associations with the experience of emotions and with individualism-collectivism. This new culturally sensitive approach represents a slight, yet important improvement in measuring well-being.",

keywords = "Cultural sensitivity, Culture, Happiness, Interdependent happiness, Life satisfaction, Self-construals, Selfhoods, Well-being",

author = "Kuba Krys and Haas, {Brian W.} and Igou, {Eric Raymond} and Aleksandra Kosiarczyk and Agata Kocimska-Bortnowska and Anna Kwiatkowska and Lun, {Vivian Miu Chi} and Fridanna Maricchiolo and Joonha Park and {\v S}olcov{\'a}, {Iva Pol{\'a}{\v c}kov{\'a}} and David Sirlop{\'u} and Yukiko Uchida and Vauclair, {Christin Melanie} and Vignoles, {Vivian L.} and Zelenski, {John M.} and Mladen Adamovic and Akotia, {Charity S.} and Isabelle Albert and Lily Appoh and Mira, {D. M.Ar{\'e}valo} and Arno Baltin and Patrick Denoux and Alejandra Dom{\'i}nguez-Espinosa and Esteves, {Carla Sofia} and Vladimer Gamsakhurdia and M{\'a}rta F{\"u}l{\"o}p and Gar{\dh}arsd{\'o}ttir, {Ragna B.} and Alin Gavreliuc and Diana Boer and Igbokwe, {David O.} and İdil I{\c s}ık and Natalia Kascakova and {Klůzov{\'a} Kr{\'a}{\v c}marov{\'a}}, Lucie and Natasza Kosakowska-Berezecka and Olga Kostoula and Nicole Kronberger and Lee, {J. Hannah} and Xinhui Liu and Magdalena {\L}u{\.z}niak-Piecha and Arina Malyonova and Barrientos, {Pablo Eduardo} and Tamara Mohori{\'c} and Oriana Mosca and Elke Murdock and Mustaffa, {Nur Fariza} and Martin Nader and Azar Nadi and Ayu Okvitawanli and {van Osch}, Yvette and Vassilis Pavlopoulos and Zoran Pavlovi{\'c} and Muhammad Rizwan and Vladyslav Romashov and Espen R{\o}ysamb and Ruta Sargautyte and Beate Schwarz and Selim, {Heyla A.} and Ursula Serdarevich and Maria Stogianni and Sun, {Chien Ru} and Julien Teyssier and {van Tilburg}, {Wijnand A.P.} and Claudio Torres and Cai Xing and Bond, {Michael Harris}",

note = "Funding Information: This work was supported by the Norway Grants 2014–2021 operated by the National Science Centre (Poland) under Project Contract No 2019/34/H/ HS6/00597 (GRIEG); National Science Centre (Poland) grant UMO-2016/23/D/HS6/02946; the Hungarian OTKA-K 135963, the Brazilian National Council for Scientific and Technological Development – CNPq under Grant 301298/2018-1; the Czech Science Foundation CSF under Grant 20-08583S, by the NPO, Systemic Risk Institute, LX22NPO510, EU - Next Generation EU; the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant 71873133; and the Department of Educational Studies, University of Roma Tre under biannual Grant DSF 2017–2018. Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2022, The Author(s).",

year = "2022",

doi = "10.1007/s10902-022-00588-1",

language = "English",

journal = "Journal Of Happiness Studies",

issn = "1389-4978",

publisher = "Springer Netherlands",

}

Krys, K, Haas, BW, Igou, ER, Kosiarczyk, A, Kocimska-Bortnowska, A, Kwiatkowska, A, Lun, VMC, Maricchiolo, F, Park, J, Šolcová, IP, Sirlopú, D, Uchida, Y, Vauclair, CM, Vignoles, VL, Zelenski, JM, Adamovic, M, Akotia, CS, Albert, I, Appoh, L, Mira, DMA, Baltin, A, Denoux, P, Domínguez-Espinosa, A, Esteves, CS, Gamsakhurdia, V, Fülöp, M, Garðarsdóttir, RB, Gavreliuc, A, Boer, D, Igbokwe, DO, Işık, İ, Kascakova, N, Klůzová Kráčmarová, L, Kosakowska-Berezecka, N, Kostoula, O, Kronberger, N, Lee, JH, Liu, X, Łużniak-Piecha, M, Malyonova, A, Barrientos, PE, Mohorić, T, Mosca, O, Murdock, E, Mustaffa, NF, Nader, M, Nadi, A, Okvitawanli, A, van Osch, Y, Pavlopoulos, V, Pavlović, Z, Rizwan, M, Romashov, V, Røysamb, E, Sargautyte, R, Schwarz, B, Selim, HA, Serdarevich, U, Stogianni, M, Sun, CR, Teyssier, J, van Tilburg, WAP, Torres, C, Xing, C & Bond, MH 2022, 'Introduction to a Culturally Sensitive Measure of Well-Being: Combining Life Satisfaction and Interdependent Happiness Across 49 Different Cultures', Journal Of Happiness Studies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-022-00588-1

TY - JOUR

T1 - Introduction to a Culturally Sensitive Measure of Well-Being

T2 - Combining Life Satisfaction and Interdependent Happiness Across 49 Different Cultures

AU - Krys, Kuba

AU - Haas, Brian W.

AU - Igou, Eric Raymond

AU - Kosiarczyk, Aleksandra

AU - Kocimska-Bortnowska, Agata

AU - Kwiatkowska, Anna

AU - Lun, Vivian Miu Chi

AU - Maricchiolo, Fridanna

AU - Park, Joonha

AU - Šolcová, Iva Poláčková

AU - Sirlopú, David

AU - Uchida, Yukiko

AU - Vauclair, Christin Melanie

AU - Vignoles, Vivian L.

AU - Zelenski, John M.

AU - Adamovic, Mladen

AU - Akotia, Charity S.

AU - Albert, Isabelle

AU - Appoh, Lily

AU - Mira, D. M.Arévalo

AU - Baltin, Arno

AU - Denoux, Patrick

AU - Domínguez-Espinosa, Alejandra

AU - Esteves, Carla Sofia

AU - Gamsakhurdia, Vladimer

AU - Fülöp, Márta

AU - Garðarsdóttir, Ragna B.

AU - Gavreliuc, Alin

AU - Boer, Diana

AU - Igbokwe, David O.

AU - Işık, İdil

AU - Kascakova, Natalia

AU - Klůzová Kráčmarová, Lucie

AU - Kosakowska-Berezecka, Natasza

AU - Kostoula, Olga

AU - Kronberger, Nicole

AU - Lee, J. Hannah

AU - Liu, Xinhui

AU - Łużniak-Piecha, Magdalena

AU - Malyonova, Arina

AU - Barrientos, Pablo Eduardo

AU - Mohorić, Tamara

AU - Mosca, Oriana

AU - Murdock, Elke

AU - Mustaffa, Nur Fariza

AU - Nader, Martin

AU - Nadi, Azar

AU - Okvitawanli, Ayu

AU - van Osch, Yvette

AU - Pavlopoulos, Vassilis

AU - Pavlović, Zoran

AU - Rizwan, Muhammad

AU - Romashov, Vladyslav

AU - Røysamb, Espen

AU - Sargautyte, Ruta

AU - Schwarz, Beate

AU - Selim, Heyla A.

AU - Serdarevich, Ursula

AU - Stogianni, Maria

AU - Sun, Chien Ru

AU - Teyssier, Julien

AU - van Tilburg, Wijnand A.P.

AU - Torres, Claudio

AU - Xing, Cai

AU - Bond, Michael Harris

N1 - Funding Information: This work was supported by the Norway Grants 2014–2021 operated by the National Science Centre (Poland) under Project Contract No 2019/34/H/ HS6/00597 (GRIEG); National Science Centre (Poland) grant UMO-2016/23/D/HS6/02946; the Hungarian OTKA-K 135963, the Brazilian National Council for Scientific and Technological Development – CNPq under Grant 301298/2018-1; the Czech Science Foundation CSF under Grant 20-08583S, by the NPO, Systemic Risk Institute, LX22NPO510, EU - Next Generation EU; the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant 71873133; and the Department of Educational Studies, University of Roma Tre under biannual Grant DSF 2017–2018. Publisher Copyright: © 2022, The Author(s).

PY - 2022

Y1 - 2022

N2 - How can one conclude that well-being is higher in country A than country B, when well-being is being measured according to the way people in country A think about well-being? We address this issue by proposing a new culturally sensitive method to comparing societal levels of well-being. We support our reasoning with data on life satisfaction and interdependent happiness focusing on individual and family, collected mostly from students, across forty-nine countries. We demonstrate that the relative idealization of the two types of well-being varies across cultural contexts and are associated with culturally different models of selfhood. Furthermore, we show that rankings of societal well-being based on life satisfaction tend to underestimate the contribution from interdependent happiness. We introduce a new culturally sensitive method for calculating societal well-being, and examine its construct validity by testing for associations with the experience of emotions and with individualism-collectivism. This new culturally sensitive approach represents a slight, yet important improvement in measuring well-being.

AB - How can one conclude that well-being is higher in country A than country B, when well-being is being measured according to the way people in country A think about well-being? We address this issue by proposing a new culturally sensitive method to comparing societal levels of well-being. We support our reasoning with data on life satisfaction and interdependent happiness focusing on individual and family, collected mostly from students, across forty-nine countries. We demonstrate that the relative idealization of the two types of well-being varies across cultural contexts and are associated with culturally different models of selfhood. Furthermore, we show that rankings of societal well-being based on life satisfaction tend to underestimate the contribution from interdependent happiness. We introduce a new culturally sensitive method for calculating societal well-being, and examine its construct validity by testing for associations with the experience of emotions and with individualism-collectivism. This new culturally sensitive approach represents a slight, yet important improvement in measuring well-being.

KW - Cultural sensitivity

KW - Culture

KW - Happiness

KW - Interdependent happiness

KW - Life satisfaction

KW - Self-construals

KW - Selfhoods

KW - Well-being

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85144906316&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10902-022-00588-1

DO - 10.1007/s10902-022-00588-1

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85144906316

SN - 1389-4978

JO - Journal Of Happiness Studies

JF - Journal Of Happiness Studies

ER -

Introduction to a Culturally Sensitive Measure of Well-Being: Combining Life Satisfaction and Interdependent Happiness Across 49 Different Cultures

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this