TY - JOUR
T1 - Invasion syndromes
T2 - a systematic approach for predicting biological invasions and facilitating effective management
AU - Novoa, Ana
AU - Richardson, David M.
AU - Pyšek, Petr
AU - Meyerson, Laura A.
AU - Bacher, Sven
AU - Canavan, Susan
AU - Catford, Jane A.
AU - Čuda, Jan
AU - Essl, Franz
AU - Foxcroft, Llewellyn C.
AU - Genovesi, Piero
AU - Hirsch, Heidi
AU - Hui, Cang
AU - Jackson, Michele C.
AU - Kueffer, Christoph
AU - Le Roux, Johannes J.
AU - Measey, John
AU - Mohanty, Nitya P.
AU - Moodley, Desika
AU - Müller-Schärer, Heinz
AU - Packer, Jasmin G.
AU - Pergl, Jan
AU - Robinson, Tamara B.
AU - Saul, Wolf Christian
AU - Shackleton, Ross T.
AU - Visser, Vernon
AU - Weyl, Olaf L.F.
AU - Yannelli, Florencia A.
AU - Wilson, John R.U.
PY - 2020/5/1
Y1 - 2020/5/1
N2 - Our ability to predict invasions has been hindered by the seemingly idiosyncratic context-dependency of individual invasions. However, we argue that robust and useful generalisations in invasion science can be made by considering “invasion syndromes” which we define as “a combination of pathways, alien species traits, and characteristics of the recipient ecosystem which collectively result in predictable dynamics and impacts, and that can be managed effectively using specific policy and management actions”. We describe this approach and outline examples that highlight its utility, including: cacti with clonal fragmentation in arid ecosystems; small aquatic organisms introduced through ballast water in harbours; large ranid frogs with frequent secondary transfers; piscivorous freshwater fishes in connected aquatic ecosystems; plant invasions in high-elevation areas; tall-statured grasses; and tree-feeding insects in forests with suitable hosts. We propose a systematic method for identifying and delimiting invasion syndromes. We argue that invasion syndromes can account for the context-dependency of biological invasions while incorporating insights from comparative studies. Adopting this approach will help to structure thinking, identify transferrable risk assessment and management lessons, and highlight similarities among events that were previously considered disparate invasion phenomena.
AB - Our ability to predict invasions has been hindered by the seemingly idiosyncratic context-dependency of individual invasions. However, we argue that robust and useful generalisations in invasion science can be made by considering “invasion syndromes” which we define as “a combination of pathways, alien species traits, and characteristics of the recipient ecosystem which collectively result in predictable dynamics and impacts, and that can be managed effectively using specific policy and management actions”. We describe this approach and outline examples that highlight its utility, including: cacti with clonal fragmentation in arid ecosystems; small aquatic organisms introduced through ballast water in harbours; large ranid frogs with frequent secondary transfers; piscivorous freshwater fishes in connected aquatic ecosystems; plant invasions in high-elevation areas; tall-statured grasses; and tree-feeding insects in forests with suitable hosts. We propose a systematic method for identifying and delimiting invasion syndromes. We argue that invasion syndromes can account for the context-dependency of biological invasions while incorporating insights from comparative studies. Adopting this approach will help to structure thinking, identify transferrable risk assessment and management lessons, and highlight similarities among events that were previously considered disparate invasion phenomena.
KW - Biological invasions
KW - Context dependency
KW - Invasion science
KW - Invasive species
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85081569299&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s10530-020-02220-w
DO - 10.1007/s10530-020-02220-w
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85081569299
SN - 1387-3547
VL - 22
SP - 1801
EP - 1820
JO - BIOLOGICAL INVASIONS
JF - BIOLOGICAL INVASIONS
IS - 5
ER -