Abstract
Grounded theory is a distinct method of qualitative research, where core features are theoretical sampling and constant comparative analysis. However, inconsistent application of these activities has been observed in published studies.
AimThis review assessed the use of theoretical sampling in grounded theory studies in nursing journals.
DesignAn adapted systematic review was conducted.
MethodThree leading nursing journals (2010–2014) were searched for studies stating grounded theory as the method. Sampling was assessed using a concise rating tool.
ResultsA high proportion (86%) of the 134 articles described an iterative process of data collection and analysis. However, half of the studies did not demonstrate theoretical sampling, with many studies declaring or indicating a purposive sampling approach throughout.
ConclusionSpecific reporting guidelines for grounded theory studies should be developed to ensure that study reports describe an iterative process of fieldwork and theoretical development.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 2284-2293 |
Number of pages | 10 |
Journal | Journal of Advanced Nursing |
Volume | 72 |
Issue number | 10 |
Early online date | 26 Apr 2016 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1 Oct 2016 |
Keywords
- grounded theory
- nursing research
- qualitative research
- research methods
- theoretical sampling