Is it really theoretical? A review of sampling in grounded theory studies in nursing journals

Niall McCrae*, Edward Purssell

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

45 Citations (Scopus)
265 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background

Grounded theory is a distinct method of qualitative research, where core features are theoretical sampling and constant comparative analysis. However, inconsistent application of these activities has been observed in published studies.

Aim

This review assessed the use of theoretical sampling in grounded theory studies in nursing journals.

Design

An adapted systematic review was conducted.

Method

Three leading nursing journals (2010–2014) were searched for studies stating grounded theory as the method. Sampling was assessed using a concise rating tool.

Results

A high proportion (86%) of the 134 articles described an iterative process of data collection and analysis. However, half of the studies did not demonstrate theoretical sampling, with many studies declaring or indicating a purposive sampling approach throughout.

Conclusion

Specific reporting guidelines for grounded theory studies should be developed to ensure that study reports describe an iterative process of fieldwork and theoretical development.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2284-2293
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Advanced Nursing
Volume72
Issue number10
Early online date26 Apr 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Oct 2016

Keywords

  • grounded theory
  • nursing research
  • qualitative research
  • research methods
  • theoretical sampling

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Is it really theoretical? A review of sampling in grounded theory studies in nursing journals'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this