Is There Room for ‘Development’ in Developmental Models of Information Processing Biases to Threat in Children and Adolescents?

Andy P. Field, Kathryn J. Lester

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

121 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Clinical and experimental theories assume that processing biases in attention and interpretation are a causal mechanism through which anxiety develops. Despite growing evidence that these processing biases are present in children and, therefore, develop long before adulthood, these theories ignore the potential role of child development. This review attempts to place information processing biases within a theoretical developmental framework. We consider whether child development has no impact on information processing biases to threat (integral bias model), or whether child development influences information processing biases and if so whether it does so by moderating the expression of an existing bias (moderation model) or by affecting the acquisition of a bias (acquisition model). We examine the extent to which these models fit with existing theory and research evidence and outline some methodological issues that need to be considered when drawing conclusions about the potential role of child development in the information processing of threat stimuli. Finally, we speculate about the developmental processes that might be important to consider in future research.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)315-332
JournalClinical Child and Family Psychology Review
Volume13
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2010

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Is There Room for ‘Development’ in Developmental Models of Information Processing Biases to Threat in Children and Adolescents?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this