Is treatment-resistant schizophrenia associated with distinct neurobiological callosal connectivity abnormalities?

Idaiane Batista De Assunção-Leme, André Zugman, Luciana Monteiro De Moura, João Ricardo Sato, Cinthia Higuchi, Bruno Bertolucci Ortiz, Cristiano Noto, Vanessa Kiyomi Ota, Sintia Iole Belangero, Rodrigo A. Bressan, Nicolas A. Crossley, Andrea P. Jackowski*, Ary Gadelha

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)


Objective: Resistance to antipsychotic treatment affects up to 30% of patients with schizophrenia (SCZ). Although the time course of development of treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS) varies from patient to patient, the reasons for these variations remain unknown. Growing evidence suggests brain dysconnectivity as a significant feature of schizophrenia. In this study, we compared fractional anisotropy (FA) of brain white matter between TRS and non-treatment-resistant schizophrenia (non-TRS) patients. Our central hypothesis was that TRS is associated with reduced FA values. Methods: TRS was defined as the persistence of moderate to severe symptoms after adequate treatment with at least two antipsychotics from different classes. Diffusion-tensor brain MRI obtained images from 34 TRS participants and 51 non-TRS. Whole-brain analysis of FA and axial, radial, and mean diffusivity were performed using tract-based spatial statistics (TBSS) and FMRIB's Software Library (FSL), yielding a contrast between TRS and non-TRS patients, corrected for multiple comparisons using family-wise error (FWE) < 0.05. Results: We found a significant reduction in FA in the splenium of corpus callosum (CC) in TRS when compared to non-TRS. The antipsychotic dose did not relate to the splenium CC. Conclusion: Our results suggest that the focal abnormality of CC may be a potential biomarker of TRS.

Original languageEnglish
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 1 Jan 2020


Dive into the research topics of 'Is treatment-resistant schizophrenia associated with distinct neurobiological callosal connectivity abnormalities?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this