King's College London

Research portal

Isolating the role of time in bed restriction in the treatment of insomnia: a randomized, controlled, dismantling trial comparing sleep restriction therapy with time in bed regularization

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Leonie Franziska Maurer, Colin Alexander Espie, Ximena Omlin, Matthew James Reid, Rachel Sharman, Dimitri Gavriloff, Richard Emsley, Simon David Kyle

Original languageEnglish
Article numberzsaa096
JournalSleep
Volume43
Issue number11
Early online date18 May 2020
DOIs
E-pub ahead of print18 May 2020
Published1 Nov 2020

Bibliographical note

© Sleep Research Society 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Sleep Research Society. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail journals.permissions@oup.com.

King's Authors

Abstract

Study Objectives: Sleep restriction therapy (SRT) is one of the most effective treatments for insomnia. Restriction of time in bed (TIB) is assumed to be the central mechanism through which SRT improves sleep consolidation and reduces insomnia symptoms. This hypothesis has never been directly tested. We designed a randomized, controlled, dismantling trial in order to isolate the role of TIB restriction in driving both clinical and polysomnographic sleep outcomes. Methods: Participants aged 25-55 who met diagnostic criteria for insomnia disorder were block-randomized (1:1) to 4 weeks of SRT or time in bed regularization (TBR), a treatment that involves the prescription of a regular but not reduced TIB. The primary outcome was assessed with the insomnia severity index (ISI) at baseline, 4-, and 12-weeks post-randomization. Secondary outcomes included sleep continuity (assessed via polysomnography, actigraphy, and diary) and quality of life. We performed intention-to-treat analyses using linear mixed models. Results: Fifty-six participants (39 females, mean age = 40.78 ± 9.08) were assigned to SRT (n = 27) or TBR (n = 29). Daily monitoring of sleep via diaries and actigraphy confirmed large group differences in TIB (d range = 1.63-1.98). At 4-weeks post-randomization, the adjusted mean difference for the ISI was −4.49 (d = −1.40) and −4.35 at 12 weeks (d = −1.36), indicating that the SRT group reported reduced insomnia severity relative to TBR. Robust treatment effects in favor of SRT were also found for objective and self-reported sleep continuity variables (d range = 0.40-0.92) and sleep-related quality of life (d = 1.29). Conclusions: For the first time, we demonstrate that TIB restriction is superior to the regularization of TIB on its own. Our results underscore the centrality of the restriction component in reducing insomnia symptoms and consolidating sleep. Statement of Significance We sought to investigate the mechanistic foundation of one of the most effective treatments for insomnia-sleep restriction therapy (SRT). This behavioral treatment, introduced in the 1980s, involves restricting and regularizing a patient's time in bed (TIB) in order to prime and strengthen sleep-wake biology. We designed a study in order to isolate the role of the restriction element relative to consistent bed and rise times in driving both clinical and polysomnography-based sleep outcomes, a hitherto unanswered but key question. In a randomized controlled trial, we show that participants allocated to SRT demonstrate greater improvements in sleep and quality of life relative to those who receive a control treatment involving the implementation of a regular-but not restricted-TIB.

View graph of relations

© 2020 King's College London | Strand | London WC2R 2LS | England | United Kingdom | Tel +44 (0)20 7836 5454