Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
Isolation of patients in psychiatric hospitals in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic : An ethical, legal, and practical challenge. / Brown, Christian; Ruck Keene, Alex; Hooper, Carwyn Rhys; O'Brien, Aileen.
In: International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, Vol. 71, 101572, 01.07.2020.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Isolation of patients in psychiatric hospitals in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic
T2 - An ethical, legal, and practical challenge
AU - Brown, Christian
AU - Ruck Keene, Alex
AU - Hooper, Carwyn Rhys
AU - O'Brien, Aileen
PY - 2020/7/1
Y1 - 2020/7/1
N2 - Psychiatric inpatients are particularly vulnerable to the transmission and effects of COVID-19. As such, healthcare providers should implement measures to prevent its spread within mental health units, including adequate testing, cohorting, and in some cases, the isolation of patients. Respiratory isolation imposes a significant limitation on an individual's right to liberty, and should be accompanied by appropriate legal safeguards. This paper explores the implications of respiratory isolation in English law, considering the applicability of the common law doctrine of necessity, the Mental Capacity Act 2005, the Mental Health Act 1983, and public health legislation. We then interrogate the practicality of currently available approaches by applying them to a series of hypothetical cases. There are currently no ‘neat’ or practicable solutions to the problem of lawfully isolating patients on mental health units, and we discuss the myriad issues with both mental health and public health law approaches to the problem. We conclude by making some suggestions to policymakers.
AB - Psychiatric inpatients are particularly vulnerable to the transmission and effects of COVID-19. As such, healthcare providers should implement measures to prevent its spread within mental health units, including adequate testing, cohorting, and in some cases, the isolation of patients. Respiratory isolation imposes a significant limitation on an individual's right to liberty, and should be accompanied by appropriate legal safeguards. This paper explores the implications of respiratory isolation in English law, considering the applicability of the common law doctrine of necessity, the Mental Capacity Act 2005, the Mental Health Act 1983, and public health legislation. We then interrogate the practicality of currently available approaches by applying them to a series of hypothetical cases. There are currently no ‘neat’ or practicable solutions to the problem of lawfully isolating patients on mental health units, and we discuss the myriad issues with both mental health and public health law approaches to the problem. We conclude by making some suggestions to policymakers.
KW - COVID-19
KW - Isolation
KW - Mental Health Act
KW - Public health law
KW - Seclusion
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85085310096&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ijlp.2020.101572
DO - 10.1016/j.ijlp.2020.101572
M3 - Article
C2 - 32768110
AN - SCOPUS:85085310096
VL - 71
JO - International Journal of Law and Psychiatry
JF - International Journal of Law and Psychiatry
SN - 0160-2527
M1 - 101572
ER -
King's College London - Homepage
© 2020 King's College London | Strand | London WC2R 2LS | England | United Kingdom | Tel +44 (0)20 7836 5454