King's College London

Research portal

Justice and Implacable Hostility to Contact: Parental Beliefs, Factual Foundation and Justification

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Standard

Justice and Implacable Hostility to Contact : Parental Beliefs, Factual Foundation and Justification. / Gilmore, Stephen.

In: Law Quarterly Review, Vol. 136, No. 1, 01.2020, p. 99-120.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Harvard

Gilmore, S 2020, 'Justice and Implacable Hostility to Contact: Parental Beliefs, Factual Foundation and Justification', Law Quarterly Review, vol. 136, no. 1, pp. 99-120. <https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/IBC1B93800FE611EAB721B3B73A397C96/View/FullText.html?originationContext=document&transitionType=DocumentItem&contextData=%28sc.Default%29&comp=wluk>

APA

Gilmore, S. (2020). Justice and Implacable Hostility to Contact: Parental Beliefs, Factual Foundation and Justification. Law Quarterly Review, 136(1), 99-120. https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/IBC1B93800FE611EAB721B3B73A397C96/View/FullText.html?originationContext=document&transitionType=DocumentItem&contextData=%28sc.Default%29&comp=wluk

Vancouver

Gilmore S. Justice and Implacable Hostility to Contact: Parental Beliefs, Factual Foundation and Justification. Law Quarterly Review. 2020 Jan;136(1):99-120.

Author

Gilmore, Stephen. / Justice and Implacable Hostility to Contact : Parental Beliefs, Factual Foundation and Justification. In: Law Quarterly Review. 2020 ; Vol. 136, No. 1. pp. 99-120.

Bibtex Download

@article{7824a5db52cd44e1a7e0a7551b2a3802,
title = "Justice and Implacable Hostility to Contact: Parental Beliefs, Factual Foundation and Justification",
abstract = "Reviews the operation of fact-finding in divorce cases in which one parent implacably opposes the other's continued contact with their child. Examines the approach of English courts to drawing inferences regarding the risk of harm to a child, the reasoning applied in case law, and how the factual basis for inferring a risk of harm is established, including the approach to hostility to contact which is factually underpinned but not justified.",
author = "Stephen Gilmore",
year = "2020",
month = jan,
language = "English",
volume = "136",
pages = "99--120",
journal = "Law Quarterly Review",
issn = "0023-933X",
publisher = "Stevens & Sons",
number = "1",

}

RIS (suitable for import to EndNote) Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Justice and Implacable Hostility to Contact

T2 - Parental Beliefs, Factual Foundation and Justification

AU - Gilmore, Stephen

PY - 2020/1

Y1 - 2020/1

N2 - Reviews the operation of fact-finding in divorce cases in which one parent implacably opposes the other's continued contact with their child. Examines the approach of English courts to drawing inferences regarding the risk of harm to a child, the reasoning applied in case law, and how the factual basis for inferring a risk of harm is established, including the approach to hostility to contact which is factually underpinned but not justified.

AB - Reviews the operation of fact-finding in divorce cases in which one parent implacably opposes the other's continued contact with their child. Examines the approach of English courts to drawing inferences regarding the risk of harm to a child, the reasoning applied in case law, and how the factual basis for inferring a risk of harm is established, including the approach to hostility to contact which is factually underpinned but not justified.

M3 - Article

VL - 136

SP - 99

EP - 120

JO - Law Quarterly Review

JF - Law Quarterly Review

SN - 0023-933X

IS - 1

ER -

View graph of relations

© 2018 King's College London | Strand | London WC2R 2LS | England | United Kingdom | Tel +44 (0)20 7836 5454