Karnataka’s crumbling coastline shows climate battles are political

Research output: Other contribution

Abstract

Scientific wisdom has moved decidedly against seawalls in recent years. A new landmark report on climate impacts and adaptation from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, or IPCC, repeatedly warns against seawalls, except in instances where they are part of a long-term plan. It warns that they can lull communities into a false sense of security as sea levels rise, apart from being expensive and hard to reverse. They are also known to transfer erosion to other parts of the coast.

But keeping the coast intact without seawalls would mean reaching into the innards of Karnataka’s remarkable growth story, and making politically damaging changes to how it manages areas as varied as its seaward trade, construction, rivers, and bureaucracy. For example, letting rivers flow undammed would allow their sediment to recharge beaches, but would jeopardise promises made to increase the state’s highly-scrutinised summertime water supply.

Climate adaptation is often seen as technocratic work, involving prediction and planning, but Karnataka’s coast is proving that it is equally about politics. It foreshadows the challenges India will face in responding to the IPCC’s new report, which calls for urgent and extensive adaptation to climate impacts across the country.
Original languageEnglish
Media of outputLong-form article
PublisherScroll.in
Publication statusPublished - 30 Mar 2022

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Karnataka’s crumbling coastline shows climate battles are political'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this