Leader Cells Define Directionality of Trunk, but Not Cranial, Neural Crest Cell Migration

Jo Richardson, Anton Gauert, Luis Briones Montecinos, Lucía Fanlo, Zainalabdeen Mohmammed Alhashem, Rodrigo Assar, Elisa Marti, Alexandre Kabla, Steffen Härtel, Claudia Linker

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

62 Citations (Scopus)
230 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Summary:
Collective cell migration is fundamental for life and a hallmark of cancer. Neural crest (NC) cells migrate collectively, but the mechanisms governing this process remain controversial. Previous analyses in Xenopus indicate that cranial NC (CNC) cells are a homogeneous population relying on cell-cell interactions for directional migration, while chick embryo analyses suggest a heterogeneous population with leader cells instructing directionality. Our data in chick and zebrafish embryos show that CNC cells do not require leader cells for migration and all cells present similar migratory capacities. In contrast, laser ablation of trunk NC (TNC) cells shows that leader cells direct movement and cell-cell contacts are required for migration. Moreover, leader and follower identities are acquired before the initiation of migration and remain fixed thereafter. Thus, two distinct mechanisms establish the directionality of CNC cells and TNC cells. This implies the existence of multiple molecular mechanisms for collective cell migration.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2076-2088
Number of pages12
JournalCell Reports
Volume15
Issue number9
Early online date19 May 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 31 May 2016

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Leader Cells Define Directionality of Trunk, but Not Cranial, Neural Crest Cell Migration'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this