Legal Humility and Perceptions of Power in International Criminal Justice

Nicola Palmer; Tomas Hamilton

doi:10.1163/15718123-bja10142

Legal Humility and Perceptions of Power in International Criminal Justice

Nicola Palmer^*, Tomas Hamilton

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article examines how judges and lawyers working in international criminal courts see their authority in relation to power exerted by states, international organisations and private actors. We draw together ethnographic research inside the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ictr) and the International Criminal Court (icc) that examined perceptions of the interactions among local, national and international legal regimes and the potential for accomplice liability for arms traders under international criminal law. Overall, we show that the legal actors in these courts routinely understood their power as severely limited by concurrent sites of private and public authority. Building on ideas of legal humility, we argue that this should be understood as 'selective humility'. This humility demonstrated a reticence among these legal actors about what internationalised courts can achieve while offering an argumentative defence against critiques of this legal practice.

Original language	English
Journal	International criminal law review
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1163/15718123-bja10142
Publication status	Accepted/In press - 2022

Keywords

ICC
ICTR
international criminal justice
legal humility
power
sociology

Access to Document

10.1163/15718123-bja10142

Cite this

@article{d01f2104706444a48e4779dc2877c686,

title = "Legal Humility and Perceptions of Power in International Criminal Justice",

abstract = "This article examines how judges and lawyers working in international criminal courts see their authority in relation to power exerted by states, international organisations and private actors. We draw together ethnographic research inside the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ictr) and the International Criminal Court (icc) that examined perceptions of the interactions among local, national and international legal regimes and the potential for accomplice liability for arms traders under international criminal law. Overall, we show that the legal actors in these courts routinely understood their power as severely limited by concurrent sites of private and public authority. Building on ideas of legal humility, we argue that this should be understood as 'selective humility'. This humility demonstrated a reticence among these legal actors about what internationalised courts can achieve while offering an argumentative defence against critiques of this legal practice.",

keywords = "ICC, ICTR, international criminal justice, legal humility, power, sociology",

author = "Nicola Palmer and Tomas Hamilton",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2022 Nicola Palmer and Tomas Hamilton.",

year = "2022",

doi = "10.1163/15718123-bja10142",

language = "English",

journal = "International criminal law review",

issn = "1567-536X",

publisher = "Martinus Nijhoff Publishers",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Legal Humility and Perceptions of Power in International Criminal Justice

AU - Palmer, Nicola

AU - Hamilton, Tomas

PY - 2022

Y1 - 2022

N2 - This article examines how judges and lawyers working in international criminal courts see their authority in relation to power exerted by states, international organisations and private actors. We draw together ethnographic research inside the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ictr) and the International Criminal Court (icc) that examined perceptions of the interactions among local, national and international legal regimes and the potential for accomplice liability for arms traders under international criminal law. Overall, we show that the legal actors in these courts routinely understood their power as severely limited by concurrent sites of private and public authority. Building on ideas of legal humility, we argue that this should be understood as 'selective humility'. This humility demonstrated a reticence among these legal actors about what internationalised courts can achieve while offering an argumentative defence against critiques of this legal practice.

AB - This article examines how judges and lawyers working in international criminal courts see their authority in relation to power exerted by states, international organisations and private actors. We draw together ethnographic research inside the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ictr) and the International Criminal Court (icc) that examined perceptions of the interactions among local, national and international legal regimes and the potential for accomplice liability for arms traders under international criminal law. Overall, we show that the legal actors in these courts routinely understood their power as severely limited by concurrent sites of private and public authority. Building on ideas of legal humility, we argue that this should be understood as 'selective humility'. This humility demonstrated a reticence among these legal actors about what internationalised courts can achieve while offering an argumentative defence against critiques of this legal practice.

KW - ICC

KW - ICTR

KW - international criminal justice

KW - legal humility

KW - power

KW - sociology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85143130797&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1163/15718123-bja10142

DO - 10.1163/15718123-bja10142

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85143130797

SN - 1567-536X

JO - International criminal law review

JF - International criminal law review

ER -

Legal Humility and Perceptions of Power in International Criminal Justice

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this