Legitimation strategies of informal groups of states: The case of the E3 directoire in the nuclear negotiations with Iran

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

9 Citations (Scopus)
136 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The European Union has seen the rise of informal groups of states as an increasingly important governance mechanism within its formal structures. Such groups can make decision-making processes more efficient, but they also suffer from a substantial lack of legitimacy in the eyes of the non-members. In this article, we examine how informal groups overcome this fundamental dilemma between efficiency and legitimacy and sustain themselves at the forefront of important policy areas. To this end, we trace the development of what we argue to be a particularly useful case: the E3 directoire in the nuclear negotiations with Iran. The empirical results point to new insights into how directoires – and informal groups in general – can use different types of legitimation strategies to gain and maintain legitimacy. More specifically, the E3 implemented three successive legitimation strategies – detachment, co-optation and integration – using different types of legitimacy sources, in particular problem-solving, institutional adjustments and fostering institutional and policy congruence.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)388-405
Number of pages18
JournalCooperation and Conflict
Volume55
Issue number3
Early online date17 Feb 2020
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Sept 2020

Keywords

  • European Union
  • Legitimation
  • Legitimacy
  • Foreign Policy
  • Informal Governance
  • Informal Groups
  • Leadership
  • Iran, nuclear
  • Iran
  • United States
  • France
  • Germany
  • United Kingdom
  • informal governance
  • legitimation strategies
  • informal groups
  • leadership
  • foreign policy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Legitimation strategies of informal groups of states: The case of the E3 directoire in the nuclear negotiations with Iran'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this