Abstract
Yarkoni makes a number of valid points in his critical analysis of psychology, but he misses an opportunity to expose the root of its problems. That root is the poor practice around the derivation of explanatory constructs. We make comment on this with an example from behaviorist history and relate this to the recent discussion of scientific understanding in the philosophy of science.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | e12 |
Journal | Behavioral and Brain Sciences |
Volume | 45 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 10 Feb 2022 |
Keywords
- Science
- Behaviorism
- Behavior
- philosophy of science