Let's talk about psychosis

Ann Steele*, Paul Chadwick, Rose McCabe

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Research suggests that while patients wish to talk about positive psychotic symptoms, psychiatrists may be reluctant to do so in routine outpatient consultations. Aims: To explore the content, context and impact of discussion of positive symptoms within psychiatric consultations. Methods: Tematic analysis was applied to frst discussions of positive symptoms, and overall impact assessed on the length of the consultation and the therapeutic relationship. Results: Sixty-fve of 143 consultations contained discussion of a positive psychotic symptom. Symptom discussion neither harmed the therapeutic relationship nor lengthened the consultation. Patients' disclosures strongly corresponded with psychological models of psychosis, emphasizing personal meaning and emotional impact. In contrast, psychiatrists focused on topographical characteristics, such as frequency and location. Strengths in psychiatric practice included using open questions, positive reinforcement and o?ering explanations tentatively. Conclusions: Findings support discussion of positive symptoms within outpatient consultations, to include necessary assessment of topography and risk alongside exploration of patients' subjective experience.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)69-76
Number of pages8
JournalClinical Schizophrenia and Related Psychoses
Volume12
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2018

Keywords

  • Communication
  • Positive Symptoms
  • Psychiatric Consultation
  • Psychosis

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Let's talk about psychosis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this