Liberal religion and illiberal secularism

Linda Woodhead*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The way in which recent conferences about religion and politics have been framed reveals hidden assumptions: 'Religion Confronts the Secular State', 'Is Religion Compatible with Liberal Democracy?', 'Post-Secular Conditions: Challenges to Citizenship, Law, and Democracy'. Such titles lend support to a widespread view that secular states are the norm, and that they are being challenged by a recent 'resurgence' of (illiberal) religion, a development which threatens to shift religion from the private to the public sphere, and in doing so raises urgent new questions about whether liberal-democratic states and societies can or should accommodate the unexpected intruder. This chapter questions every one of these assumptions: that religion was ever separate from the modern state, politics and public life; that religion and liberalism are inevitably at odds with each other; and that secularism has a more constitutive relation with liberalism than religion. For the sake of brevity, examples are taken from the British situation, but the argument applies more widely. Let me begin by sketching what I mean by liberalism. First, I mean something wider than 'liberalism' as it appears in those political theory textbooks where it is presented as a political ideology alongside conservatism, socialism, Marxism and so on. This is a bloodless abstraction of liberalism: detached from history, institutional embodiment, compelling symbolic forms and social life.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationReligion in a Liberal State
PublisherCambridge University Press
Pages93-116
Number of pages24
ISBN (Electronic)9781107323674
ISBN (Print)9781107042032
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2010

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Liberal religion and illiberal secularism'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this