King's College London

Research portal

Local ownership and un peacebuilding: Discourse versus operationalization

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)299-315
Number of pages17
JournalGlobal Governance
Volume21
Issue number2
DOIs
Published1 Apr 2015

King's Authors

Research Groups

  • King's College London

Abstract

The UN asserts that local ownership boosts the legitimacy and sustainability of peacebuilding by preserving the principles of self-determination and nonimposition in an activity that can contravene them. At the same time, it also perceives local ownership to imperil the achievement of its operational goals, thus bringing its normative and operational obligations into conflict. This article evaluates the UN’s discourse and operationalization of local ownership, showing that despite the UN’s invocation of ownership discourse, it operationalizes ownership in restrictive ways that are intended to protect the achievement of operational goals but that consequently limit self-determination and increase imposition. Moreover, because of contradictions in the UN’s practices of ownership, it also undercuts its ability to realize the very operational goals that it is trying to protect.

View graph of relations

© 2020 King's College London | Strand | London WC2R 2LS | England | United Kingdom | Tel +44 (0)20 7836 5454