King's College London

Research portal

“Loneliness can also kill”: a qualitative exploration of outcomes and experiences of the SUPERB peer-befriending scheme for people with aphasia and their significant others

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Becky Moss, Nicholas Behn, Sarah Northcott, Katie Monnelly, Jane Marshall, Alan Simpson, Shirley Thomas, Sally McVicker, Kimberley Goldsmith, Chris Flood, Katerina Hilari

Original languageEnglish
JournalDisability and Rehabilitation
DOIs
Accepted/In press23 Apr 2021
Published4 Jun 2021

Documents

  • Loneliness can kill Moss et al

    Loneliness_can_kill_Moss_et_al.pdf, 2.29 MB, application/pdf

    Uploaded date:07 Jun 2021

    Version:Final published version

    Licence:CC BY-NC-ND

King's Authors

Abstract

Purpose: People with aphasia post-stroke are at risk for depression and social isolation. Peer-befriending from someone with similar experiences may promote wellbeing and provide support. This paper explored the views of people with aphasia and their significant others about peer-befriending. Materials and methods: We conducted a qualitative study within a feasibility trial (SUPERB) on peer-befriending for people with post-stroke aphasia and low levels of distress. Of the 28 participants randomised to the intervention, semi-structured in-depth interviews were conducted with 10 purposively selected people with aphasia (at both 4- and 10-months post-randomisation) and five of their significant others (at 4-months). Interviews were analysed using Framework Analysis. Results: Participants and their significant others were positive about peer-befriending and identified factors which influenced their experience: the befrienders’ personal experience of stroke and aphasia, their character traits and the resulting rapport these created, the conversation topics they discussed and settings they met in, and the logistics of befriending, including planning visits and negotiating their end. Interviewees also made evaluative comments about the befriending scheme. Conclusion: Peer-befriending was an acceptable intervention. Benefits for emotional wellbeing and companionship were reported. The shared experience in the befriending relationship was highly valued.Implications for Rehabilitation The lived experience of stroke and aphasia of befrienders was highly valued by people with aphasia receiving peer-befriending. Training, regular supervision, and support for befrienders with practicalities such as organising visits ensured the befriending scheme was perceived as straightforward and acceptable by befriendees. Those receiving peer-befriending would recommend it to others; they found it beneficial, especially in terms of emotional wellbeing and companionship.

Download statistics

No data available

View graph of relations

© 2020 King's College London | Strand | London WC2R 2LS | England | United Kingdom | Tel +44 (0)20 7836 5454