Abstract
Hermann Lotze argued that the fact that consciousness simultaneously ‘holds objects together as well as apart’ such that they can be compared implies (a) that there is a simple thinker and (b) that consciousness is an ‘indivisible unity’. I offer a reconstruction and evaluation of Lotze’s Argument from Comparison. I content that it does not deliver (a), but makes a good case for (b). I will relate Lotze’s argument to the contemporary debate between ‘top-down’ and ‘bottom-up’ views of the unity of consciousness and locate it in its historical context (Kant and Herbart figure prominently here).
Original language | English |
---|---|
Number of pages | 41 |
Journal | CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY |
Publication status | Accepted/In press - 10 Dec 2022 |