King's College London

Research portal

Lowering costs for large-scale screening in psychosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis of performance and value of information for speech-based psychiatric evaluation

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Felipe Argolo, Guilherme Magnavita, Natalia Bezerra Mota, Carolina Ziebold, Dirceu Mabunda, Pedro M. Pan, André Zugman, Ary Gadelha, Cheryl Corcoran, Rodrigo A. Bressan

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)673-686
Number of pages14
JournalBrazilian Journal of Psychiatry
Volume42
Issue number6
DOIs
Published2020

King's Authors

Abstract

Objective: Obstacles for computational tools in psychiatry include gathering robust evidence and keeping implementation costs reasonable. We report a systematic review of automated speech evaluation for the psychosis spectrum and analyze the value of information for a screening program in a healthcare system with a limited number of psychiatrists (Maputo, Mozambique). Methods: Original studies on speech analysis for forecasting of conversion in individuals at clinical high risk (CHR) for psychosis, diagnosis of manifested psychotic disorder, and first-episode psychosis (FEP) were included in this review. Studies addressing non-verbal components of speech (e.g., pitch, tone) were excluded. Results: Of 168 works identified, 28 original studies were included. Valuable speech features included direct measures (e.g., relative word counting) and mathematical embeddings (e.g.: word-to-vector, graphs). Accuracy estimates reported for schizophrenia diagnosis and CHR conversion ranged from 71 to 100% across studies. Studies used structured interviews, directed tasks, or prompted free speech. Directed-task protocols were faster while seemingly maintaining performance. The expected value of perfect information is USD 9.34 million. Imperfect tests would nevertheless yield high value. Conclusion: Accuracy for screening and diagnosis was high. Larger studies are needed to enhance precision of classificatory estimates. Automated analysis presents itself as a feasible, low-cost method which should be especially useful for regions in which the physician pool is insufficient to meet demand.

View graph of relations

© 2020 King's College London | Strand | London WC2R 2LS | England | United Kingdom | Tel +44 (0)20 7836 5454