TY - JOUR
T1 - Magnetisation loss behaviour in insulated and non-insulated HTS REBCO double-pancake and racetrack coils at 77 K
AU - Koshy, Ben George
AU - Bouloukakis, Konstantinos
AU - Ainslie, Mark
AU - Sun, Yueming
AU - Badcock, Rodney A.
AU - Mallett, Benjamin P. P.
AU - Jiang, Zhenan
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 The Author(s). Published by IOP Publishing Ltd.
PY - 2025/4/1
Y1 - 2025/4/1
N2 - In many high-temperature superconducting applications, the advantages of no-insulation (NI) coils, such as self-protecting capability and thermal stability, make them a promising alternative to insulated (INS) coils. Magnetisation loss will be generated when the coil is exposed to time-varying magnetic fields. This loss can vary with the applied field angle, magnitude, and frequency, resulting in parasitic heat loads. In this study, we investigate magnetization loss in NI and INS double-pancake and double-racetrack coils of identical dimensions, experimentally and numerically. Experiments were conducted at 77 K under external AC magnetic fields up to 100 mT, considering various field angles (0°-90°) and frequencies (73-146 Hz). The experimental results are compared with the finite element simulation results of the coils’ three-dimensional models. Interestingly, NI coils exhibit no significant angular dependence of loss within a specific field range; however, beyond this range loss increases with increasing field angles. In contrast, the loss in INS coils consistently increases with decreasing field angles across the entire field range. Coil level shielding of the magnetic field is observed in NI coils under parallel fields which is similar to a bulk superconductor. The losses in INS and NI coils are comparable under a perpendicular magnetic field, which can be attributed to the dominance of superconducting currents, as confirmed by the current and field distributions observed in simulations.
AB - In many high-temperature superconducting applications, the advantages of no-insulation (NI) coils, such as self-protecting capability and thermal stability, make them a promising alternative to insulated (INS) coils. Magnetisation loss will be generated when the coil is exposed to time-varying magnetic fields. This loss can vary with the applied field angle, magnitude, and frequency, resulting in parasitic heat loads. In this study, we investigate magnetization loss in NI and INS double-pancake and double-racetrack coils of identical dimensions, experimentally and numerically. Experiments were conducted at 77 K under external AC magnetic fields up to 100 mT, considering various field angles (0°-90°) and frequencies (73-146 Hz). The experimental results are compared with the finite element simulation results of the coils’ three-dimensional models. Interestingly, NI coils exhibit no significant angular dependence of loss within a specific field range; however, beyond this range loss increases with increasing field angles. In contrast, the loss in INS coils consistently increases with decreasing field angles across the entire field range. Coil level shielding of the magnetic field is observed in NI coils under parallel fields which is similar to a bulk superconductor. The losses in INS and NI coils are comparable under a perpendicular magnetic field, which can be attributed to the dominance of superconducting currents, as confirmed by the current and field distributions observed in simulations.
KW - magnetization loss
KW - HTS no-insulation coils
KW - HTS insulated coils
KW - HTS coil modelling
KW - angular dependence
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=105000021637&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1088/1361-6668/adbce2
DO - 10.1088/1361-6668/adbce2
M3 - Article
SN - 0953-2048
VL - 38
JO - Superconductor Science and Technology
JF - Superconductor Science and Technology
IS - 4
M1 - 045004
ER -