TY - JOUR
T1 - Managing arrhythmia in cardiac resynchronisation therapy
AU - de Vere, Felicity
AU - Wijesuriya, Nadeev
AU - Elliott, Mark K.
AU - Mehta, Vishal
AU - Howell, Sandra
AU - Bishop, Martin
AU - Strocchi, Marina
AU - Niederer, Steven A.
AU - Rinaldi, Christopher A.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
2023 de Vere, Wijesuriya, Elliott, Mehta, Howell, Bishop, Strocchi, Niederer and Rinaldi.
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - Arrhythmia is an extremely common finding in patients receiving cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT). Despite this, in the majority of randomised trials testing CRT efficacy, patients with a recent history of arrhythmia were excluded. Most of our knowledge into the management of arrhythmia in CRT is therefore based on arrhythmia trials in the heart failure (HF) population, rather than from trials dedicated to the CRT population. However, unique to CRT patients is the aim to reach as close to 100% biventricular pacing (BVP) as possible, with HF outcomes greatly influenced by relatively small changes in pacing percentage. Thus, in comparison to the average HF patient, there is an even greater incentive for controlling arrhythmia, to achieve minimal interference with the effective delivery of BVP. In this review, we examine both atrial and ventricular arrhythmias, addressing their impact on CRT, and discuss the available evidence regarding optimal arrhythmia management in this patient group. We review pharmacological and procedural-based approaches, and lastly explore novel ways of harnessing device data to guide treatment of arrhythmia in CRT.
AB - Arrhythmia is an extremely common finding in patients receiving cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT). Despite this, in the majority of randomised trials testing CRT efficacy, patients with a recent history of arrhythmia were excluded. Most of our knowledge into the management of arrhythmia in CRT is therefore based on arrhythmia trials in the heart failure (HF) population, rather than from trials dedicated to the CRT population. However, unique to CRT patients is the aim to reach as close to 100% biventricular pacing (BVP) as possible, with HF outcomes greatly influenced by relatively small changes in pacing percentage. Thus, in comparison to the average HF patient, there is an even greater incentive for controlling arrhythmia, to achieve minimal interference with the effective delivery of BVP. In this review, we examine both atrial and ventricular arrhythmias, addressing their impact on CRT, and discuss the available evidence regarding optimal arrhythmia management in this patient group. We review pharmacological and procedural-based approaches, and lastly explore novel ways of harnessing device data to guide treatment of arrhythmia in CRT.
KW - AF ablation
KW - arrhythmia (any)
KW - atrial fibillation
KW - AV node ablation
KW - cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT)
KW - heart failure
KW - supraventricular arrhythmias
KW - ventricular arrhythmia (VAs)
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85168395082&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1211560
DO - 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1211560
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:85168395082
SN - 2297-055X
VL - 10
JO - Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
JF - Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
M1 - 1211560
ER -