Abstract
Linguistic meaning underdetermines what is said. This has consequences for philosophical accounts of meaning, communication, and propositional attitude reports. I argue that the consequence we should endorse is that utterances typically express many propositions, that these are what speakers mean, and that the correct semantics for attitude reports will handle this fact while being relational and propositional.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 165-189 |
Journal | DIALECTICA |
Volume | 72 |
Issue number | 2 |
Early online date | 24 Aug 2018 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2018 |