Measuring common mental disorders in women in Ethiopia: reliability and construct validity of the comprehensive psychopathological rating scale

Charlotte Hanlon, Girmay Medhin, Atalay Alem, Mesfin Araya, Abdulreshid Abdulahi, Markos Tesfaye, Dawit Wondimagegn, Hassan Taha, Birke Anbesse, Yonas Baheretibeb, Michael Dewey, Martin Prince

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

23 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is a dearth of methodological studies critically evaluating reliability, validity and feasibility of measures of common mental disorders (CMD) in low-income countries.

METHODS: Test-retest and inter-rater reliability of categorisation of CMD caseness, according to locally agreed criteria using the Comprehensive Psychopathological Rating Scale (CPRS), was measured in 99 women from out-patient clinics (inter-rater) and 99 women from a primary healthcare centre (test-retest) in Ethiopia. The construct validity of CMD as measured with CPRS was assessed with exploratory factor analysis using maximum likelihood with varimax rotation.

RESULTS: Test-retest reliability was fair (kappa = 0.29). Subsequent assessment of inter-rater reliability found excellent agreement (kappa = 0.82). The construct of CMD appeared unidimensional, combining depressive, anxiety and somatic symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS: Detection of socioculturally meaningful cases of CMD in Ethiopia can be reliably achieved with local psychiatrist assessment using CPRS, although thorough training is essential.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)653 - 659
Number of pages7
JournalSocial Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
Volume43
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2008

Keywords

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Ethiopia
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Mental Disorders
  • Middle Aged
  • Psychiatric Status Rating Scales
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Women's Health
  • Young Adult

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Measuring common mental disorders in women in Ethiopia: reliability and construct validity of the comprehensive psychopathological rating scale'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this