Measuring patient-reported outcomes in psychosis: conceptual and methodological review

Ulrich Reininghaus, Stefan Priebe

Research output: Contribution to journalLiterature reviewpeer-review

56 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background
There are calls to use patient-reported outcomes (PROs) routinely across mental health services. However, the use of PROs in patients with psychosis has been questioned.

Aims
To examine the concepts and measures of four widely used PROs: treatment satisfaction, subjective quality of life, needs for care and the quality of the therapeutic relationship.

Method
We conducted a literature search of academic databases on concepts, characteristics and psychometric properties of the four PROs in patients with psychosis.

Results
Although numerous concepts and measures have been published, evidence on the methodological quality of existing PROs is limited. Measures designed to assess distinct PROs showed a considerable conceptual, operational and empirical overlap, and some of them also included specific aspects. The impact of symptoms and cognitive deficits appears unlikely to be of clinical significance.

Conclusions
The popularity of PROs has not been matched with progress in their conceptualisation and measurement. Based on current evidence, some recommendations can be made. Distinct and short measures with clinical relevance and sufficient psychometric properties should be preferred. Future research should optimise the validity and measurement precision of PROs, while reducing assessment burden.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)262-267
Number of pages6
JournalBritish Journal of Psychiatry
Volume201
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2012

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Measuring patient-reported outcomes in psychosis: conceptual and methodological review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this