King's College London

Research portal

Meat made us moral: a hypothesis on the nature and evolution of moral judgment

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)903-931
Number of pages29
JournalBIOLOGY AND PHILOSOPHY
Volume28
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2013

King's Authors

Abstract

In the first part of the article, an account of moral judgment in terms of emotional dispositions is given. This account provides an expressivist explanation of three important features of moral demands: inescapability, authority independence and meriting. In the second part of the article, some ideas initially put forward by Christopher Boehm are developed and modified in order to provide a hypothesis about the evolution of the ability to token moral judgments. This hypothesis makes evolutionary sense of inescapability, authority independence and meriting. It does so by referring to the selection pressures generated in the Late Pleistocene by large-game hunting. If the hypothesis is correct, we can say that, in a sense, meat made us moral.

View graph of relations

© 2015 King's College London | Strand | London WC2R 2LS | England | United Kingdom | Tel +44 (0)20 7836 5454