Mechanical circulatory support in the cardiac catheterization laboratory for cardiogenic shock

Matt Ryan, Natalia Briceno, Divaka Perera*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Despite the development of acute revascularisation, the mortality rate for cardiogenic shock remains around 50%. Mechanical circulatory support devices have long held promise in improving outcomes in shock, but high-quality evidence of benefit has not been forthcoming. In this article we review the currently available devices for treating shock, their physiological effects and the evidence base for their use in practice. We subsequently look ahead within this developing field, including new devices and novel indications for established technology.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)197-213
Number of pages17
JournalKorean Circulation Journal
Volume49
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2019

Keywords

  • Cardiogenic
  • Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation
  • Myocardial infarction
  • Shock

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Mechanical circulatory support in the cardiac catheterization laboratory for cardiogenic shock'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this