Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
Antonis Sergis, William Wade, Jennifer Elizabeth Gallagher, Alexander Morrell, Shanon Patel, Chris Dickinson, Najla Nizarali, Eric Whaites, Joanna Johnson, Owen Addison, Yannis Hardalupas
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 261-267 |
Number of pages | 7 |
Journal | Journal of Dental Research |
Volume | 100 |
Issue number | 3 |
DOIs | |
Accepted/In press | 17 Nov 2020 |
Published | 1 Mar 2021 |
Additional links |
JDR-20-1224.R3_Proof_for self archiving
JDR_20_1224.R3_Proof_for_self_archiving.pdf, 2.42 MB, application/pdf
Uploaded date:10 Dec 2020
Version:Submitted manuscript
Since the onset of coronavirus disease 2019, the potential risk of dental procedural generated spray emissions (including aerosols and splatters), for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 transmission, has challenged care providers and policy makers alike. New studies have described the production and dissemination of sprays during simulated dental procedures, but findings lack generalizability beyond their measurements setting. This study aims to describe the fundamental mechanisms associated with spray production from rotary dental instrumentation with particular focus on what are currently considered high-risk components—namely, the production of small droplets that may remain suspended in the room environment for extended periods and the dispersal of high-velocity droplets resulting in formites at distant surfaces. Procedural sprays were parametrically studied with variables including rotation speed, burr-to-tooth contact, and coolant premisting modified and visualized using high-speed imaging and broadband or monochromatic laser light–sheet illumination. Droplet velocities were estimated and probability density maps for all laser illuminated sprays generated. The impact of varying the coolant parameters on heating during instrumentation was considered. Complex structured sprays were produced by water-cooled rotary instruments, which, in the worst case of an air turbine, included droplet projection speeds in excess of 12 m/s and the formation of millions of small droplets that may remain suspended. Elimination of premisting (mixing of coolant water and air prior to burr contact) resulted in a significant reduction in small droplets, but radial atomization may still occur and is modified by burr-to-tooth contact. Spatial probability distribution mapping identified a threshold for rotation speeds for radial atomization between 80,000 and 100,000 rpm. In this operatory mode, cutting efficiency is reduced but sufficient coolant effectiveness appears to be maintained. Multiple mechanisms for atomization of fluids from rotatory instrumentation exist, but parameters can be controlled to modify key spray characteristics during the current crisis.
King's College London - Homepage
© 2020 King's College London | Strand | London WC2R 2LS | England | United Kingdom | Tel +44 (0)20 7836 5454