4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The distinction between clinical recovery and personal recovery is made, and the dominance of personal recovery as a guiding vision for mental health services is described. Two empirically based conceptualisations are presented: a recovery practice framework developed through inductive thematic analysis to identify how services can support recovery, and a systematic review to develop a conceptual framework within which to understand how recovery is operationalised. The systematic review identified key recovery processes as Connectedness, Hope and optimism, Identity, Meaning and purpose and Empowerment (the CHIME framework). The evidence base for interventions to support recovery is then reviewed, in relation to these five key recovery processes. A manualised intervention is described, which is based on these two empirically supported conceptualisations: the REFOCUS intervention which is currently being evaluated in a cluster randomised controlled trial (ISRCTN02507940) described at researchintorecovery.com/refocus.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationImproving Mental Health Care
Subtitle of host publicationThe Global Challenge
PublisherWILEY-BLACKWELL
Pages40-56
Number of pages17
ISBN (Electronic)9781118337981
ISBN (Print)9781118337974
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 12 Jun 2013

Keywords

  • Mental health services
  • Personal recovery
  • Recovery process
  • Recovery-oriented

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Mental health services and recovery'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this