Abstract
What determines the meaning of a context-sensitive expression in a context? It is standardly assumed that, for a given expression type, there will be a unitary answer to this question; most of the literature on the subject involves arguments designed to show that one particular metasemantic proposal is superior to a specific set of alternatives. The task of the present essay will be to explore whether this is a warranted assumption, or whether the quest for the one true metasemantics might be a Quixotic one. We argue that there are good reasons - much better than are commonly appreciated - for thinking the latter, but that there nevertheless remains significant scope for metasemantic theorizing. We conclude by outlining our preferred option, metasemantic pluralism.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 135-154 |
| Number of pages | 20 |
| Journal | PHILOSOPHICAL QUARTERLY |
| Volume | 72 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| Early online date | 16 Feb 2021 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 31 Jan 2022 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Meta-Metasemantics, or the Quest for the One True Metasemantics'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver