King's College London

Research portal

Metformin and health outcomes: An umbrella review of systematic reviews with meta-analyses

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Xue Li, Stefano Celotto, Damiano Pizzol, Danijela Gasevic, Meng Meng Ji, Tommaso Barnini, Marco Solmi, Brendon Stubbs, Lee Smith, Guillermo F. López Sánchez, Gabriella Pesolillo, Zengli Yu, Ioanna Tzoulaki, Evropi Theodoratou, John P.A. Ioannidis, Nicola Veronese, Jacopo Demurtas

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere13536
JournalEuropean Journal of Clinical Investigation
Volume51
Issue number7
DOIs
Accepted/In press2021
PublishedJul 2021

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright: © 2021 Stichting European Society for Clinical Investigation Journal Foundation. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd Copyright: Copyright 2021 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.

King's Authors

Abstract

Background: The objective was to capture the breadth of outcomes that have been associated with metformin use and to systematically assess the quality, strength and credibility of these associations using the umbrella review methodology. Methods: Four major databases were searched until 31 May 2020. Meta-analyses of observational studies and meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) (including active and placebo control arms) were included. Results: From 175 eligible publications, we identified 427 different meta-analyses, including 167 meta-analyses of observational studies, 147 meta-analyses of RCTs for metformin vs placebo/no treatment and 113 meta-analyses of RCTs for metformin vs active medications. There was no association classified as convincing or highly suggestive from meta-analyses of observational studies, but some suggestive/weak associations of metformin use with a lower mortality risk of CVD and cancer. In meta-analyses of RCTs, metformin was associated with a lower incidence of diabetes in people with prediabetes or no diabetes at baseline; lower ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome incidence (in women in controlled ovarian stimulation); higher success for clinical pregnancy rate in poly-cystic ovary syndrome (PCOS); and significant reduction in body mass index in people with type 1 diabetes mellitus, in women who have obesity/overweight with PCOS and in obese/overweight women. Of 175 publications, 166 scored as low or critically low quality per AMSTAR 2 criteria. Conclusions: Observational evidence on metformin seems largely unreliable. Randomized evidence shows benefits for preventing diabetes and in some gynaecological and obstetrical settings. However, almost all meta-analyses are of low or critically low quality according to AMSTAR 2 criteria.

View graph of relations

© 2020 King's College London | Strand | London WC2R 2LS | England | United Kingdom | Tel +44 (0)20 7836 5454