Abstract
The English School approach to International Relations generally claims to put forward an understanding of international affairs that occupies a "middle ground" between a power-politics view and an understanding informed by morality. In this article I claim that this attempt at a "middle ground" position does not work. Instead, I propose a constitutive theory as a better way to achieve this reconciliation.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Ethical Reasoning in International Affairs |
| Subtitle of host publication | Arguments from the Middle Ground |
| Editors | Cornelia Navari |
| Place of Publication | Basingstoke |
| Publisher | Palgrave Macmillan |
| Pages | 64-80 |
| Number of pages | 17 |
| ISBN (Print) | 9781137290953 |
| Publication status | Published - 2013 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Keywords
- International Relations
- Ethics in International Relations
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Middle Ground Ethics and Human Rights in International Relations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver