Mitomycin or cisplatin chemoradiation with or without maintenance chemotherapy for treatment of squamous-cell carcinoma of the anus (ACT II): a randomised, phase 3, open-label, 2x2 factorial trial

Roger D. James, Robert Glynne-Jones*, Helen M. Meadows, David Cunningham, Arthur Sun Myint, Mark P. Saunders, Timothy Maughan, Alec McDonald, Sharadah Essapen, Martin Leslie, Stephen Falk, Charles Wilson, Simon Gollins, Rubina Begum, Jonathan Ledermann, Latha Kadalayil, David Sebag-Montefiore

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    539 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Background 
    Chemoradiation became the standard of care for anal cancer after the ACT I trial. However, only two-thirds of patients achieved local control, with 5-year survival of 50%; therefore, better treatments are needed. We investigated whether replacing mitomycin with cisplatin in chemoradiation improves response, and whether maintenance chemotherapy after chemoradiation improves survival.

    Methods 
    In this 2x2 factorial trial, we enrolled patients with histologically confirmed squamous-cell carcinoma of the anus without metastatic disease from 59 centres in the UK. Patients were randomly assigned to one of four groups, to receive either mitomycin (12 mg/m(2) on day 1) or cisplatin (60 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 29), with fluorouracil (1000 mg/m(2) per day on days 1-4 and 29-32) and radiotherapy (50.4 Gy in 28 daily fractions); with or without two courses of maintenance chemotherapy (fluorouracil and cisplatin at weeks 11 and 14). The random allocation was generated by computer and patients assigned by telephone. Randomisation was done by minimisation and stratified by tumour site, T and N stage, sex, age, and renal function. Neither patients nor investigators were masked to assignment. Primary endpoints were complete response at 26 weeks and acute toxic effects (for chemoradiation), and progression-free survival (for maintenance). The primary analyses were done by intention to treat. This study is registered at controlled-trials.com, number 26715889.

    Findings 
    We enrolled 940 patients: 472 were assigned to mitomycin, of whom 246 were assigned to no maintenance, 226 to maintenance; 468 were assigned to cisplatin, of whom 246 were assigned to no maintenance, 222 to maintenance. Median follow-up was 5.1 years (IQR 3.9-6.9). 391 of 432 (90.5%) patients in the mitomycin group versus 386 of 431 (89.6%) in the cisplatin group had a complete response at 26 weeks (difference -0.9%, 95% CI -4.9 to 3.1; p=0.64). Overall, toxic effects were similar in each group (334/472 [71%] for mitomycin vs 337/468 [72%] for cisplatin). The most common grade 3-4 toxic effects were skin (228/472 [48%] vs 222/468 [47%]), pain (122/472 [26%] vs 135/468 [29%]), haematological (124/472 [26%] vs 73/468 [16%]), and gastrointestinal (75/472 [16%] vs 85/468 [18%]). 3-year progression-free survival was 74% (95% CI 69-77; maintenance) versus 73% (95% CI 68-77; no maintenance; hazard ratio 0.95, 95% CI 0.75-1.21; p=0.70).

    Interpretation 
    The results of our trial-the largest in anal cancer to date-show that fluorouracil and mitomycin with 50.4 Gy radiotherapy in 28 daily fractions should remain standard practice in the UK.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)516-524
    Number of pages9
    JournalThe Lancet Oncology
    Volume14
    Issue number6
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - May 2013

    Keywords

    • ANAL-CANAL CARCINOMA
    • HIGH-DOSE RADIATION
    • TERM-FOLLOW-UP
    • TREATMENT TIME
    • LOCAL-CONTROL
    • CANCER
    • FLUOROURACIL
    • RADIOTHERAPY
    • 5-FLUOROURACIL
    • THERAPY

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Mitomycin or cisplatin chemoradiation with or without maintenance chemotherapy for treatment of squamous-cell carcinoma of the anus (ACT II): a randomised, phase 3, open-label, 2x2 factorial trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this