Models of Adult Safeguarding in England: Findings from a Study of Costs and Referral Outcomes

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

6 Citations (Scopus)
177 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Adult safeguarding is the subject of increasing attention in England and internationally. This article draws on research which developed a typology of ‘models of safeguarding’. ‘Models’ refer to different ways local authorities in England organise adult safeguarding (about which there is little evidence) rather than ‘model’ approaches to be emulated. The four models identified were: Dispersed-Generic (safeguarding work undertaken by operational teams); Dispersed-Specialist (safeguarding work undertaken partly by specialist social workers located in operational teams); Partially Centralised-Specialist (some safeguarding work undertaken by a central specialist safeguarding team); and Fully- Centralised-Specialist (all safeguarding work undertaken by a specialist safeguarding team). We explored associations between these models and other important variables (numbers of referrals, kinds of alleged abuse and characteristics of adults at risk) and outcomes. The article reports secondary analysis of English local authority safeguarding referral data and on the possible different costs of different models. Dispersed-Specialist sites appeared to have a higher rate of substantiating alleged abuse compared with other models. Statistical correlations were found with types of victim profiles and the perpetrator/victim relationship. It may be that decisions about local organisation of safeguarding are more affected by local organisational contexts than local authority model.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1224-1244
Number of pages21
JournalBritish Journal of Social Work
Volume47
Issue number4
Early online date14 Apr 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2017

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Models of Adult Safeguarding in England: Findings from a Study of Costs and Referral Outcomes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this